Breve análisis del subportátil Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13ISK
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK (seb) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK (seb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 265 cd/m²
Contraste: 803:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.48% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK LG Philips LP133WF2-SPL1, IPS | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK LGD048C (LP133WF2-SPL1), IPS | Asus X302UV-FN016T InfoVision M133NWN1 R3, TN LED | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW LG LP133WF2-SPL3, IPS | HP Envy 13-d020ng AU Optronics AUO272D, IPS | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T ChiMei N133HSE-EA3 (CMN1361), IPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, TN LED | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 23% | -1% | 59% | 64% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.48 | 40.74 3% 38.91 -1% | 48.37 23% | 39.18 -1% | 63.7 61% | 67.5 71% | 40.1 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 60.6 2% 58.5 -1% | 72.6 23% | 58.6 -1% | 93 57% | 92.5 56% | 59.8 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.8 | 42.15 3% 40.21 -1% | 49.98 23% | 40.51 -1% | 65.1 60% | 67.7 66% | 41.51 2% |
| Response Times | -18% | -9% | -37% | 103% | 102% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33 ? | 46 ? -39% | 42 ? -27% | 41 ? -24% | 34 ? -3% | 31 ? 6% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22 ? 4% | 23 ? -0% | 34.4 ? -50% | 24 ? -4% | 22 ? 4% | |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? 0% | 208 ? 316% | 198 ? 296% | |||
| Screen | -8% | -7% | -16% | 24% | 19% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 265 | 219 -17% | 218 -18% | 247 -7% | 345 30% | 357 35% | 329 24% |
| Brightness | 261 | 212 -19% | 210 -20% | 239 -8% | 335 28% | 351 34% | 310 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 82 -9% | 88 -2% | 81 -10% | 95 6% | 90 0% | 82 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.35 -6% | 0.5 -52% | 0.38 -15% | 0.25 24% | 0.58 -76% | 0.405 -23% |
| Contrast | 803 | 626 -22% | 436 -46% | 650 -19% | 1380 72% | 616 -23% | 812 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.98 | 4.95 1% | 3.89 22% | 5.95 -19% | 4.94 1% | 3.39 32% | 3.96 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.75 | 11.17 -15% | 7.11 27% | 14.2 -46% | 8.85 9% | 6.76 31% | 7.51 23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.45 12% | 4.9 -26% | 5.25 -35% | 5.85 -50% | 2.36 39% | 3.51 10% |
| Gamma | 2.55 86% | 2.34 94% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 3.83 57% |
| CCT | 7318 89% | 6815 95% | 7860 83% | 6736 96% | 7105 91% | 6653 98% | 6711 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37 -3% | 46 21% | 37.28 -2% | 60 58% | 60 58% | 38.4 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 58 -2% | 73 24% | 58.37 -1% | 93 58% | 93 58% | 59.8 1% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -8% /
-6% | 2% /
-2% | -18% /
-16% | 62% /
45% | 62% /
43% | 5% /
6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 80 % de brillo |   |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 80 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 33 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 41 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark 7 Score | 2846 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3077 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3560 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3629 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | HP Envy 13-d020ng Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-FN121T Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 23% | 5639% | 8603% | 35% | 8596% | -20% | |
| Read Seq | 108.3 | 108.1 0% | 428.2 295% | 515 376% | 116.4 7% | 478.7 342% | 97.7 -10% |
| Write Seq | 109 | 113 4% | 178.6 64% | 338 210% | 120.7 11% | 268.5 146% | 94.5 -13% |
| Read 512 | 35.24 | 37.68 7% | 282.6 702% | 368.1 945% | 37.01 5% | 386.6 997% | 31.27 -11% |
| Write 512 | 53.3 | 61.2 15% | 179.1 236% | 338.6 535% | 73.1 37% | 268.8 404% | 35.06 -34% |
| Read 4k | 0.395 | 0.48 22% | 6.559 1561% | 28.88 7211% | 0.507 28% | 26.88 6705% | 0.379 -4% |
| Write 4k | 1.19 | 3.439 189% | 71.2 5883% | 74.2 6135% | 4.156 249% | 78.7 6513% | 0.862 -28% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.139 | 1.026 -10% | 253 22112% | 319.9 27986% | 0.967 -15% | 369.4 32332% | 0.792 -30% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.212 | 0.673 -44% | 174 14256% | 309.4 25428% | 0.652 -46% | 259.7 21327% | 0.871 -28% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5463 puntos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1488 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49866 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5341 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 749 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 68.3 | 34.6 | 20.3 | 9.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.2 | 24.7 | 20.5 | 6 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 32 | 25.3 | 16.8 | 5.4 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 32.1 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 32.1 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 40 / 40.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 7% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 31.2 | 31.3 -0% | 31.2 -0% | 29.1 7% | 31.3 -0% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 32.1 | 31.3 2% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 9% | 32.5 -1% | 31.3 2% | 29.2 9% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 31.7 1% | 32.9 -2% | 29.1 9% | 32.5 -1% | 31.3 2% | 29.2 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.1 | 31.8 1% | 33 -3% | 29.1 9% | 32.4 -1% | 31.5 2% | 29.2 9% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 36.7 8% | 33 17% | 41.1 -3% | 36 10% | 33.2 17% | 40.2 -1% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 39.4 4% | 34.6 15% | 46.4 -13% | 36.5 11% | 34.1 17% | 46.3 -13% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | 13% | -6% | -3% | 8% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 35.9 6% | 29.6 22% | 37.1 2% | 51 -34% | 38.1 -0% | 43.8 -15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.1 | 39.1 -0% | 41 -5% | 43.2 -10% | 46 -18% | 40.3 -3% | 42.1 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.7 | 27.8 9% | 24.8 19% | 32.1 -5% | 25.5 17% | 25.8 16% | 28.5 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.1 | 29.1 6% | 26.6 14% | 34.4 -11% | 24.4 22% | 25.5 18% | 28.9 7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 7.2 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
32 / 33 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus X302UV-FN016T 6200U, GeForce 920MX | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 6267U, Iris Graphics 550 | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 16% | -5% | -2% | 14% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 5.2 -4% | 3.3 34% | 3.4 32% | 4.2 16% | 3.5 30% | 2.7 46% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.9 4% | 5.1 29% | 6.5 10% | 7.4 -3% | 7.3 -1% | 5.7 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 7.2 17% | 5.2 40% | 7 20% | 10.1 -16% | 7.9 9% | 6 31% |
| Load Average * | 32 | 26.7 17% | 29.5 8% | 44.5 -39% | 33.4 -4% | 26.6 17% | 32.1 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 33 | 28.2 15% | 44 -33% | 49.5 -50% | 34.7 -5% | 28 15% | 36.2 -10% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK 35 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 500S-13ISK 35 Wh | Asus X302UV-FN016T 38 Wh | Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW 51 Wh | HP Envy 13-d020ng 45 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX303UA-R4051T 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -5% | 12% | 74% | 9% | 16% | 88% | |
| Reader / Idle | 555 | 615 11% | 1035 86% | 1572 183% | |||
| H.264 | 325 | 311 -4% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 301 -14% | 392 12% | 412 17% | 381 9% | 407 16% | 620 77% |
| Load | 94 | 81 -14% | 206 119% | 97 3% |
Pro
Contra
El Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-13ISK de 13.3" ofrece bastante rendimiento para el uso diario. El portátil no se calienta demasiado ni hace demasiado ruido. Gracias al HDD tradicional, el usuario tiene 1 TB de espacio de almacenamiento. También puede cambiarse el HDD por un SSD más rápido. El usuario tiene que sacar la parte inferior del portátil para ello, pero no debería ser demasiado difícil. El teclado es bueno para los mecanógrafos ya que tiene teclas iluminadas. La batería aguanta relativamente mucho, pero, como demuestran otros modelos de 13.3", es posible ofrecer más. La pantalla Full HD IPS igual no es excepcional, pero hace bien su trabajo.
El IdeaPad es un portátil ideal para los estudiantes. Sin embargo, su aguante de batería debería ser superior.
Si puedes tolerar el aguante mediocre de la batería, el modelo 80SJ0019GE es una buena elección. Por 599 Euros el usuario se lleva una CPU Core i3-6100U, un SSD de 128 GB y una pantalla FHD. El IdeaPad 500S-13ISK se puede conseguir por 550 Euros con HDD en vez de SSD.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo Ideapad 510S-13ISK
- 12/05/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
