Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del tablet Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 392 cd/m²
Contraste: 1568:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Medion Lifetab P10505 IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 8% | -20% | -65% | -0% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 392 | 435 11% | 542 38% | 320 -18% | 363 -7% | 370 -6% |
| Brightness | 383 | 413 8% | 520 36% | 308 -20% | 344 -10% | 351 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 93 15% | 91 12% | 84 4% | 87 7% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.25 -0% | 0.68 -172% | 0.36 -44% | 0.34 -36% | 0.4 -60% |
| Contrast | 1568 | 1740 11% | 797 -49% | 889 -43% | 1068 -32% | 925 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.4 -5% | 4.2 -0% | 7.5 -79% | 3.25 23% | 4.6 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.2 | 7.7 31% | 6.7 40% | 16.1 -44% | 5.68 49% | 9.5 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.2 -10% | 4.8 -66% | 10.8 -272% | 2.78 4% | 6.5 -124% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.35 94% | 2.42 91% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7115 91% | 7056 92% | 7434 87% | 9907 66% | 6722 97% | 6354 102% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 93 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 41 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 61 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | |
| Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | |
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | Medion Lifetab P10505 | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 27% | 17% | -26% | -47% | 1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 216 | 133.5 -38% | 215.8 0% | 142.9 -34% | 127.8 -41% | 163.5 -24% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 66 | 60.3 -9% | 45.88 -30% | 44 -33% | 50.2 -24% | 121.2 84% |
| Random Read 4KB | 23 | 38.8 69% | 23.46 2% | 23 0% | 10.9 -53% | 25.79 12% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.8 | 8.5 -13% | 10.01 2% | 11.7 19% | 3.12 -68% | 7.36 -25% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 40.9 | 78.7 92% | 75.5 85% | 18.9 -54% | 37 -10% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.9 | 56.8 63% | 50.1 44% | 15.4 -56% | 24.7 -29% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 16 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.14 / 0.23 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.76 / 3.23 / 3.35 Watt |
| Carga |
4.79 / 5.72 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F 10200 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -41% | -36% | -81% | -88% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 1.45 -91% | 1.18 -55% | 2.01 -164% | 2.54 -234% | 1.22 -61% |
| Idle Average * | 3.23 | 4.44 -37% | 4.65 -44% | 4.82 -49% | 5.1 -58% | 3.15 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.35 | 4.61 -38% | 4.74 -41% | 4.89 -46% | 5.24 -56% | 3.39 -1% |
| Load Average * | 4.79 | 6.21 -30% | 5.75 -20% | 8.35 -74% | 7.07 -48% | 3.95 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.72 | 6.33 -11% | 6.97 -22% | 9.91 -73% | 8.24 -44% | 5.64 1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) 4680 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 6600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Medion Lifetab P10505 7000 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 YT3-X50F 10200 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 28% | 66% | -1% | 59% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1321 | 1345 2% | 2634 99% | 1445 9% | 2830 114% | 1275 -3% |
| H.264 | 622 | 833 34% | 893 44% | 740 19% | 603 -3% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 467 | 802 72% | 826 77% | 564 21% | 776 66% | 435 -7% |
| Load | 302 | 312 3% | 428 42% | 203 -33% | 415 37% | 279 -8% |
Pro
Contra
El Asus ZenPad 10 Z301ML ofrece soporte LTE, un panel HD y una carcasa elegante y relativamente ligera por 240 euros. Sin embargo, esto implica bastantes "peros": El Asus ZenPad 10 Z300M anterior ofrece una configuración mejor en algunos aspectos y un mejor funcionamiento, y ahora cuesta considerablemente menos. Muchas tabletas del siguiente nivel de precio superior ahora también han entrado en el nivel de precios de la ZenPad 10 y derrotan a la tableta en muchas áreas, como la resolución, el rendimiento o la duración de la batería.
Entonces, ¿Por qué Asus se ha esforzado en una actualización? Esto es difícil de responder. La nueva versión Full HD Z301MFL puede ser considerablemente más competitiva, ya que ofrece más memoria RAM y un SoC más rápido.
Los puntos fuertes del ZenPad 10 Z301ML se encuentran en la pantalla de alto contraste, un buen software con muchos ajustes, cámaras decentes y la conectividad con LTE. Sin embargo, muchas tabletas de mismo precio superan en muchos aspectos.
Puede valer la pena comprar el dispositivo si su precio baja pronto, el dinero es un problema y necesita una tableta con Internet móvil. El comprador obtendrá una pantalla decente, cámaras con una buena calidad de imagen, y por supuesto, LTE. Sin embargo, existen mejores alternativas para el precio actual del fabricante.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
-
08/15/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer