Breve análisis de la tablet Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 419 cd/m²
Contraste: 1074:1 (Negro: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.6
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 17% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 419 | 363 -13% | 425 1% | 460 10% |
| Brightness | 412 | 348 -16% | 402 -2% | 445 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.26 33% | 0.4 -3% | 0.45 -15% |
| Contrast | 1074 | 1396 30% | 1063 -1% | 1022 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 5.8 32% | 4.98 41% | 6.2 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.8 | 17.8 -29% | 6.61 52% | 10.5 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.3 | 5.5 47% | 5.2 50% | 6.5 37% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.65 83% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6216 105% | 7388 88% | 7249 90% | 8056 81% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 11.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 47 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 35.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16.4 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 45 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | Xiaomi MiPad 2 | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | 12% | 69% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 159.1 | 158.4 0% | 147.9 -7% | 249.7 57% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 47.23 | 45.71 -3% | 56.4 19% | 117.2 148% |
| Random Read 4KB | 21.55 | 21.96 2% | 24.42 13% | 32.04 49% |
| Random Write 4KB | 11.51 | 8.35 -27% | 13.96 21% | 31.35 172% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 51.1 | 35.2 -31% | 61.7 21% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.15 | 24.9 -27% | 23.52 -31% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.18 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.99 / 2.74 / 2.83 Watt |
| Carga |
4.51 / 5.69 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | -110% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.99 | 1.32 -33% | 3.33 -236% | 1.51 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 2.74 | 2.71 1% | 5.01 -83% | 3.64 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.83 | 2.83 -0% | 5.19 -83% | 3.68 -30% |
| Load Average * | 4.51 | 4.24 6% | 8.32 -84% | 6.95 -54% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.69 | 5.01 12% | 9.33 -64% | 9.11 -60% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -30% | -45% | -32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2032 | 1305 -36% | 1110 -45% | |
| H.264 | 744 | 624 -16% | 583 -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 770 | 472 -39% | 421 -45% | 546 -29% |
| Load | 393 | 287 -27% | 268 -32% |
Pro
Contra
Como sus predecesores y hermanos de 7" y 10", el Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017) ofrece un increible ratio de precio-rendimiento.
Equipado con un display 1280x800 IPS de 8" , un SoC quad-core MediaTek MT8163, y capacidad de almacenamiento de 16 o 32 GB, el Fire HD ofrece suficiente rendimiento para el uso diario. Y aunque esto también es cierto para sus competidores, estos tienden a ser más caros. Entre $80 y $125 te pueden conseguir un tablet bien hecho con buena duración de la batería y audio estéreo decente.
Aquellos de vosotros, que ya tengáis el predecesor, podeis saltaros esta versión. Aparte de mejoras menores (tarjeta microSD de más capacidad, GPU un poco más rápido) no ha cambiado tanto realmente.
Por otro lado, el tablet viene con sus propias limitaciones, principalmente el obvio enfoque al ecosistema Amazon. Google Play Store no es oficialmente compatible e instalarlo anularía la garantía. El Fire HD 8 (2017) es el dispositivo perfecto si planeas quedarte en el Universo de Amazon.
Otras limitaciones son simplemente terribles, como los anticuados cimientos en el SO Android 5.1.1, la falta de GPS y WWAN y las cámaras pobres a las que deberías hacerles la vista gorda para encontrarlas remotamente aceptables.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
- 07/07/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
