Breve análisis del Asus AsusPro P4540UQ (7200U, 940MX, Full-HD)
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 296 cd/m²
Contraste: 1022:1 (Negro: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5568 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -33% | -35% | -35% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.3 | 39.89 -37% | 38.65 -39% | 38.58 -39% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.6 | 59.5 -29% | 58 -31% | 58 -31% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.1 | 41.24 -33% | 39.94 -35% | 39.85 -35% | |
| Response Times | -46% | -3% | 6% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 51 ? -34% | 44.8 ? -18% | 43 ? -13% | 47.6 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 30 ? -3% | 25.6 ? 12% | 22 ? 24% | 27.2 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 50 ? -100% | |||
| Screen | -84% | -15% | -84% | -82% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 214 -22% | 242 -12% | 180 -35% | 229 -17% |
| Brightness | 283 | 201 -29% | 243 -14% | 178 -37% | 222 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 77 -9% | 75 -12% | 93 9% | 82 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.43 -59% | 0.24 11% | 0.45 -67% | 0.56 -107% |
| Contrast | 1022 | 498 -51% | 1008 -1% | 400 -61% | 409 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 10.68 -172% | 4.65 -19% | 9.91 -153% | 10.36 -164% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.13 | 18.07 -98% | 9.64 -6% | 18.19 -99% | 14.95 -64% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 11.32 -335% | 3.39 -30% | 11.25 -333% | 10.9 -319% |
| Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.26 97% | 2.7 81% | 2.35 94% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6561 99% | 12204 53% | 6246 104% | 12115 54% | 10084 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54.5 | 38 -30% | 36.69 -33% | 37 -32% | 37.69 -31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83.7 | 59 -30% | 57.66 -31% | 58 -31% | 57.92 -31% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -54% /
-67% | -18% /
-17% | -38% /
-62% | -46% /
-70% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 21000 Hz | ≤ 90 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 21000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 90 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 21000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 38 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 51 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3428 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4256 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4478 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Liteonit CV3-8D256 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -15% | 71% | 5% | 10% | |
| Seq Read | 502 | 493.8 -2% | 1227 144% | 402.9 -20% | 502 0% |
| Seq Write | 190.8 | 315.9 66% | 636 233% | 333.5 75% | 465.2 144% |
| 4K Read | 27.19 | 17.96 -34% | 37.12 37% | 29.56 9% | 26.84 -1% |
| 4K Write | 63.5 | 73.4 16% | 73.1 15% | 62.9 -1% | 50.3 -21% |
| 4K-64 Read | 364.5 | 137.1 -62% | 654 79% | 328.5 -10% | 357.9 -2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 233.6 | 195.5 -16% | 232.5 0% | 163.6 -30% | 156.4 -33% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.084 | 0.141 -68% | 0.06 29% | 0.091 -8% | 0.098 -17% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.224 | 0.159 29% | 0.036 84% | 0.057 75% | 0.083 63% |
| Score Read | 442 | 204 -54% | 813 84% | 398 -10% | 435 -2% |
| Score Write | 316 | 300 -5% | 369 17% | 260 -18% | 253 -20% |
| Score Total | 977 | 607 -38% | 1578 62% | 869 -11% | 917 -6% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2800 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 51531 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7704 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1916 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 633 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 5568 | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Dell Vostro 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 111 | 63.3 | 55 | 20.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.9 | 89.8 | 53.1 | 47.7 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 70 | 34.3 | 19.7 | 5.7 |
| For Honor (2017) | 50.7 | 18.2 | 17.4 | 12.9 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 32.2 | 12.5 | 11.3 | 6 |
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 31.2 | 14.5 | 9.8 | 8.6 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| Dell Vostro 15 5568 | |
| MSI CX62 7QL | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 36.5 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 35.4 / 37.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.8 °C / -6.8 F).
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.9 / 8.1 / 9.4 Watt |
| Carga |
50 / 63.7 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU | |
Pro
Contra
El Asus AsusPro P4540UQ lleva un procesador Core-i5 Kaby-Lake que debería satisfacer completamente las demandas de la mayoría de usuarios. La GPU GeForce permite el uso de videojuegos. A pesar de la decente potencia de cálculo del dispositivo, apenas se caldea y casi siempre funciona de forma queda.
Un SSD se asegura de que el sistema vaya rápido. Gracias a la escotilla de mantenimiento, se puede cambiar el SSD rápidamente. También está la opción de insertar un disco 2.5" adicional en el ordenador. Sin embargo, haría falta un marco de monta para ello. La pantalla mate IPS del ordenador agrada con ángulos de visión estables, buen contraste, y brillo decente. El excelente aguante tampoco debería olvidarse.
Con el AsusPro P4540UQ, Asus compite de verdad con los jefazos establecidos.
El teclado puede mejorar. No que el teclado integrado sea malo, pero no le puede hacer frente a los modelos integrados en HP Probook 450 G4 y Lenovo Thinkpad E570. Lo que es más, al teclado Asus le falta iluminación. Pero a ese respecto, la competencia no va tampoco muy allá.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
- 04/06/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
