Breve análisis del Convertible Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 87 %
Brillo con batería: 374 cd/m²
Contraste: 1269:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 2% | -37% | -3% | -25% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.1 | 64.8 1% | 65.1 2% | 39.99 -38% | 62.2 -3% | 47.32 -26% | 65.4 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 93.1 1% | 93 1% | 59.5 -35% | 90.1 -2% | 71.1 -23% | 90.4 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 66 1% | 66.5 2% | 41.32 -37% | 63.5 -3% | 48.83 -25% | 65.8 1% |
| Response Times | 16% | 107% | -28% | -9% | 643% | 2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 29 ? 19% | 29 ? 19% | 56 ? -56% | 46 ? -28% | 48 ? -33% | 33.2 ? 8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 19 ? 30% | 22 ? 19% | 27 ? -0% | 24 ? 11% | 32.8 ? -21% | 28 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? 0% | 192 ? 284% | 1042 ? 1984% | |||
| Screen | -4% | -8% | -7% | -15% | -11% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 368 | 344 -7% | 302 -18% | 245 -33% | 348 -5% | 322.6 -12% | 334.6 -9% |
| Brightness | 350 | 326 -7% | 298 -15% | 233 -33% | 310 -11% | 306 -13% | 319 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 90 3% | 87 0% | 80 -8% | 91 5% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.27 7% | 0.21 28% | 0.21 28% | 0.25 14% | 0.19 34% | 0.336 -16% |
| Contrast | 1269 | 1274 0% | 1438 13% | 1167 -8% | 1392 10% | 1698 34% | 996 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.26 | 5.53 -5% | 6.33 -20% | 4.2 20% | 7.86 -49% | 7.7 -46% | 6.21 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.78 | 10.01 -14% | 11.89 -35% | 8.75 -0% | 13.43 -53% | 11.1 -26% | 12 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.87 | 6.67 -14% | 8.13 -39% | 3.94 33% | 8.25 -41% | 7.9 -35% | 7.71 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.52 87% | 2.66 83% | 2.05 107% | 2.88 76% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6998 93% | 7012 93% | 6811 95% | 6096 107% | 6834 95% | 7044 92% | 6458 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 38 -37% | 58 -3% | 44.1 -26% | 58.6 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 93 1% | 93 1% | 59 -36% | 90 -2% | 69.9 -24% | 90 -2% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 4% /
1% | 34% /
15% | -24% /
-15% | -9% /
-12% | 202% /
109% | -4% /
-9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 50 Hz | ≤ 50 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 50 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 50 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 50 Hz es bajísima, por lo que el parpadeo puede causar fatiga visual y cefaleas cuando se usa mucho tiempo. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 15 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3665 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Lite-On CV1-8B128 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 13% | -17% | 111% | 76% | 96% | |
| Read Seq | 478.4 | 452.1 -5% | 497 4% | 1412 195% | 1206 152% | 1376 188% |
| Write Seq | 419.9 | 421.3 0% | 182.9 -56% | 578 38% | 629 50% | 571 36% |
| Read 512 | 351.7 | 288.6 -18% | 353 0% | 701 99% | 966 175% | 679 93% |
| Write 512 | 294.2 | 310.7 6% | 144.1 -51% | 580 97% | 410.7 40% | 571 94% |
| Read 4k | 24 | 28.52 19% | 31.89 33% | 43.5 81% | 32.93 37% | 42.66 78% |
| Write 4k | 87 | 72.1 -17% | 62 -29% | 159.7 84% | 121.2 39% | 137.9 59% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 199.3 | 389.6 95% | 207.7 4% | 570 186% | 411 106% | 535 168% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 232.4 | 285.3 23% | 131.8 -43% | 488.7 110% | 250.2 8% | 361.2 55% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1741 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.7 | 32.6 | 26.6 | 8.4 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 29.9 | 13.1 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 23.4 | 8.9 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 31.7 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.5 / 36 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.36 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 7.4 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
32 / 30.2 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
Contra
El modelo Skylake del Zenbook que testamos tenía bisagras endebles. No pudieron sostener la tapa a ciertos ángulos y se cerraba. No podemos decir si se trata de un caso único o un problema general. Sin embargo, podemso decir que las bisagras de nuestro modelo de pruebas actual son más firmes y permiten todos los modos de uso que debe.
Un éxito a la segunda: Asus ofrece un convertible mayormente decente con su Zenbook UX360UAK. Sin embargo, el ventilador silbante del dispositivo es inapropiado.
El procesador Core i5 Kaby Lake tiene potencia de cálculo más que suficiente para todos los escenarios de uso comunes. El portátil no se calienta demasiado y suele ir en silencio al menos en inactivo. El ventilador resulta ser uno de los puntos débiles del Zenbook en cuanto acelera. Produce un silbido sordo que no debería darse. Un veloz SSD asegura un sistema fluido. Los usuarios que quieran cambiar el SSD por otro mayor tendrán que sacar la bandeja base. No hay escotilla de mantenimiento.
El aguante de batería es sobresaliente. El Zenbook supera al modelo Skylake en este aspecto. El teclado también es bueno. El panel IPS agrada con brillo elevado, alto contraste, ángulo de visión estable, y su reproducción de color de fábrica. Nuestro modelo de pruebas traía un protector de pantalla antirreflejos que lleva a una mejora clara respecto a las pantallas lustrosas. Sorprende que Asus no lo anuncie.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
- 02/21/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
