Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del Convertible Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD)

Pantalla decepcionante. El convertible de 14" de Lenovo cuesta unos 500 Euros. El comprador se lleva una APU Stoney Ridge con un SSD, y 4 GB de RAM. Lenovo arruina la buena impresión general instalando un panel TN.
Yoga 510-14AST (Yoga 510 Serie)
Procesador
AMD A9-9410 2 x 2.9 - 3.5 GHz, Stoney Ridge
Adaptador gráfico
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), Núcleo: 800 MHz, single-channel, Crimson 17.2.1
Memoría
4 GB 
, DDR4-2132, monocanal, una ranura de memoria (ocupada)
pantalla
14.00 pulgadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixels 112 PPI, capacitiva, 10 puntos, soporta Active Stylus, AU Optronics B140XTN02.E, TN LED, lustroso: si
Placa base
AMD CZ FCH
Tarjeta de sonido
Realtek ALC236 @ AMD K15.7 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Conexiones: audio combinado, Card Reader: SD, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: movimiento
Equipamento de red
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 20.9 x 336.4 x 232
Battería
35 Wh, 4510 mAh Litio-Ion, 8.7 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Luz de Teclado: no, Lenovo Photo Master, McAfee LiveSafe (demo), MS Office 365 (demo), 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.75 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 176 g
Precio
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

336.4 mm 232 mm 20.9 mm 1.8 kg336 mm 232 mm 20.9 mm 1.7 kg328 mm 229 mm 20 mm 1.7 kg326.4 mm 222 mm 19.8 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
 
68.1 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
 
64.1 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
59.7 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
 
87.5 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
 
86.7 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
85.3 MB/s -2%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
349 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
332 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
347 MBit/s +85%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
188 MBit/s
219
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
226
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
AU Optronics B140XTN02.E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 242 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 224 cd/m² Minimum: 24.2 cd/m²
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 390:1 (Negro: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 14.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.28% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
34.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
TN LED, 1366x768, 14"
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
22%
15%
17%
Display P3 Coverage
34.15
41.78
22%
39.43
15%
39.99
17%
sRGB Coverage
51.4
62.9
22%
59.1
15%
59.5
16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
35.28
43.17
22%
40.76
16%
41.32
17%
Response Times
-5%
30%
14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
70 ?(32, 38)
53 ?(20, 33)
24%
38 ?(14, 24)
46%
56 ?(18, 38)
20%
Response Time Black / White *
29 ?(23, 6)
39 ?(12, 27)
-34%
25 ?(6, 19)
14%
27 ?(8, 19)
7%
PWM Frequency
350 ?(60)
Screen
37%
39%
49%
Brightness middle
242
243
0%
277
14%
245
1%
Brightness
224
248
11%
263
17%
233
4%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
88
0%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.62
0.32
48%
0.31
50%
0.21
66%
Contrast
390
759
95%
894
129%
1167
199%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
13.03
5.44
58%
5.57
57%
4.2
68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.79
9.73
48%
13.6
28%
8.75
53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
14.6
4.74
68%
4.56
69%
3.94
73%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.38 92%
2.28 96%
2.66 83%
CCT
18869 34%
7799 83%
6648 98%
6096 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
33
39.6
20%
38
15%
38
15%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
52
62.5
20%
59
13%
59
13%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
18% / 28%
28% / 33%
27% / 38%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 23 ms subida
↘ 6 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
70 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 32 ms subida
↘ 38 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 98 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3497
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4619
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2694
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
16.56 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.82 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
22.71 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
63 Points
ayuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points +106%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points +100%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
96 Points +52%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
92 Points +46%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points +35%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
74 Points +17%
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
68 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
63 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points -16%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points +155%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points +152%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
240 Points +85%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
216 Points +66%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points +60%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
187 Points +44%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599
Intel Core i3-4010U
173 Points +33%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599
Intel Core i3-4010U
173 Points +33%
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
170 Points +31%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
130 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points -48%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points +131%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.4 Points +51%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
2.09 Points +31%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599
Intel Core i3-4010U
1.85 Points +16%
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
1.8 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
1.59 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.86 Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.38 Points +68%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1.04 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
0.82 Points
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599
Intel Core i3-4010U
0.77 Points -6%
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
0.73 Points -11%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
0.66 Points -20%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.41 Points -50%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11347 Points +146%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
7321 Points +58%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
6309 Points +37%
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
5584 Points +21%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
5284 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
4619 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points -51%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
4986 Points +85%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3477 Points +29%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
2777 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
2694 Points
Lenovo M30-70
Intel Core i3-4010U
2447 Points -9%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1677 Points -38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1216 Points -55%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2852 Points +34%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2459 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
2134 Points
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
1788 Points -16%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1362 Points -36%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6431 Points +95%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
4686 Points +42%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4425 Points +34%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
3755 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
3299 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3576 Points +68%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
2133 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1555 Points -27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6725 Points +111%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4162 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
3182 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
211.4 Points +62%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng
Intel Core m3-6Y30
133.5 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD A9-9410
130.4 Points
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE
Intel Core i3-4030U
123.2 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
111.1 Points -15%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
90.9 Points -30%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
89.1 Points -32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
58.5 Points -55%
PCMark 7 Score
3814 puntos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2670 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2898 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3728 puntos
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points +33%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
3274 Points +23%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3224 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
2670 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4121 Points +11%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
4050 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
3728 Points
Sequential Read: 434.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 207.7 MB/s
512K Read: 356.3 MB/s
512K Write: 195.6 MB/s
4K Read: 26.71 MB/s
4K Write: 56.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 176.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 163.3 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
 
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
61%
-87%
Read Seq
434.6
518
19%
104.8
-76%
Write Seq
207.7
476.5
129%
91
-56%
Read 512
356.3
408
15%
20.67
-94%
Write 512
195.6
274.5
40%
45.05
-77%
Read 4k
26.71
35.66
34%
0.215
-99%
Write 4k
56.8
106.7
88%
1.037
-98%
Read 4k QD32
176.3
368.7
109%
0.968
-99%
Write 4k QD32
163.3
246.3
51%
1.09
-99%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
5141 puntos
3DMark Vantage P Result
3346 puntos
3DMark 11 Performance
1199 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
36896 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3010 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
712 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
344 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
274 puntos
ayuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points +38%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1390 Points +17%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1213 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410
1190 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6799 Points +43%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
6249 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
5249 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410
4755 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
989 Points +28%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410
772 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
762 Points -1%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
752 Points -3%
bajomedioaltoultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 82.6 43.7
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) 62.4 29
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 32.7 22.2 15.4
Diablo III (2012) 59.6 41.8 33.6
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 39.2 28.5 25
Dead Space 3 (2013) 63.9 31 26.6
Tomb Raider (2013) 51.9 25.7 18.2
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43.5 26.9 22.2
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 31.7 17.7 9.6
GRID: Autosport (2014) 65.1 29.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014) 20.9 12.9
Sims 4 (2014) 111.9 34.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 22.3 13.8
F1 2014 (2014) 39 30
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) 19.3 14.8
Dirt Rally (2015) 59.7 22
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 34.1 24.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 33.1 23.2
World of Warships (2015) 37.7 28.8
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 26.9 21.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 16.1 10.4
The Division (2016) 18.2 11.3
Civilization VI (2016) 29.4 12.1
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 53.4 36.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 28.6 13.2
For Honor (2017) 19.9 7.3
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 10.9 5.2
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
43.5 fps
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
42.77 fps -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
42.3 fps -3%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
38.6 fps -11%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
22.2 fps -49%
Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Low Preset
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
62.1 fps +20%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
51.9 fps
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
31.2 fps -40%
GRID: Autosport - 1024x768 Ultra Low Preset
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410
65.1 fps
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
51.5 fps -21%

Ruido

Ocioso
30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A)
Carga
31.3 / 33.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520
Noise
-5%
-5%
-2%
off / environment *
30.4
29
5%
30.5
-0%
30.5
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
29
5%
31.3
-3%
30.5
-0%
Idle Average *
30.4
29
5%
31.3
-3%
30.5
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.4
29
5%
31.6
-4%
30.6
-1%
Load Average *
31.3
37.3
-19%
34.2
-9%
31
1%
Load Maximum *
33.3
43.1
-29%
37.3
-12%
36.8
-11%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.834.832.432253331.231.732.13136.436.135.335.24030.129.929.830.3502829.329.127.96327.228.328.228.18026.22725.727.610025.425.725.625.512524.724.32524.216023.523.423.423.820023.123.522.822.725021.921.52222.431521.721.12121.840021.120.42021.950020.319.419.520.863019.21919.119.180019.918.118.319.8100021.218.217.821.5125020.317.717.620.116001917.417.718.8200018.617.717.518.4250018.817.817.918.7315018.218.21818.1400018.218.117.918.2500018.318.218.118.1630018.318.418.418.3800018.518.418.518.31000018.418.618.518.41250018.318.418.318.21600018.318.318.418.3SPL31.330.530.431.3N1.61.41.41.6median 19.2median 18.4median 18.4median 19.1Delta1.71.21.11.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Carga Máx.
 25.4 °C34.5 °C32.3 °C 
 24.4 °C30.8 °C29.4 °C 
 23.4 °C23 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 34.5 °C
Médio: 27.7 °C
28.7 °C39 °C32.3 °C
25.7 °C33.8 °C25 °C
24.1 °C22.8 °C23 °C
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 28.3 °C
Conector de corriente  31.1 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520
Heat
-6%
10%
-0%
Maximum Upper Side *
34.5
40.1
-16%
34.6
-0%
38.3
-11%
Maximum Bottom *
39
46.1
-18%
36.4
7%
42.5
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
30.8
28.5
7%
26.6
14%
28.7
7%
Idle Bottom *
33.4
31.6
5%
27.7
17%
29.4
12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.934.831.92531.731.231.73134.936.134.94029.729.929.75029.529.329.56328.228.328.28026.92726.910026.525.726.512527.524.327.516029.623.429.620033.223.533.22504321.54331554.721.154.740062.120.462.150057.419.457.463056.41956.48006518.165100065.118.265.1125061.617.761.6160060.517.460.5200059.517.759.525006017.860315060.618.260.6400060.118.160.1500061.518.261.5630053.118.453.1800060.218.460.21000065.418.665.4125006518.465160006018.360SPL73.530.573.5N32.51.432.5median 60median 18.4median 60Delta7.61.27.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga 510-14ASTApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.28 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.4 / 9.4 Watt
Carga midlight 19.2 / 22.5 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520
Power Consumption
-40%
-17%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.9
-0%
4.7
-21%
4.1
-5%
Idle Average *
7.4
7.1
4%
7.2
3%
6.8
8%
Idle Maximum *
9.4
7.7
18%
7.9
16%
7.9
16%
Load Average *
19.2
33.4
-74%
30
-56%
20.4
-6%
Load Maximum *
22.5
55.9
-148%
29
-29%
26.8
-19%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
14h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
5h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 06min
Carga (máximo brillo)
1h 52min
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Duración de Batería
-4%
-13%
16%
Reader / Idle
847
722
-15%
560
-34%
749
-12%
H.264
306
320
5%
WiFi v1.3
325
373
15%
322
-1%
463
42%
Load
112
100
-11%
86
-23%
133
19%

Pro

+ buena construcción
+ funcionamiento quedo
+ bajas temperaturas
+ teclado decente
+ SSD
+ WiFi AC

Contra

- panel TN dependiente del ángulo de visión
- pantalla oscura de poco contraste
- poco aguante de batería
- USB no Type-C
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST 80S90018GE. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST 80S90018GE. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de Notebooksbilliger.de

Con el Yoga 510-14AST, Lenovo ofrece la versión asequible del Yoga 510-15IKB que hemos testado ya. Costando unos 500 Euros, el Yoga 510-14AST es unos buenos 400 Euros más barato que el modelo hermano que testamos. La nueva APU Stoney Bridge causó una buena impresión: La CPU tiene potencia suficiente para el uso previsto (oficina, Internet), y la GPU compite con la Intel HD Graphics 520 y renderiza fluidamente algún juego que otro.

El Yoga sigue quedo toda la carga y se calienta moderadamente como mucho. Un SSD asegura un sistema veloz. Los usuarios que necesiten más capacidad de almacenamiento de los 128 GB del SSD pueden cambiarlo por un modelo de más capacidad. Hay que sacar la bandeja inferior del portátil para ello. El teclado instalado es atractivo en general, e incluso permite sesiones de mecanografiado frecuentes. El aguante de batería es corto.

La pantalla es decepcionante. Los responsables de Lenovo parecen creer que un panel TN dependiente del ángulo de visión es una buena elección para un convertible.

Lo que es más, encima es un modelo oscuro de poco contraste que sólo ofrece una mala reproducción de color de fábrica. Lenovo disminuye el atractivo del dispositivo considerablemente con esta pantalla. Una pena ya que Lenovo ha creado un dispositivo realmente redondo que podría haber encontrado compradores. Aparentemente no se puede elegir otro modelo. Todas las versiones del 14AST disponibles a fecha de prueba venían con esta pantalla inferior - incomprensible.

Los usuarios que quieran un panel de ángulo de visión estable tendrá que optar por un modelo Intel Yoga. El Yoga 510-14IKB 80VB0081GE cuesta 50 Euros más y trae un procesador Core i3-7100U mucho más potente y una pantalla Full HD IPS de ángulo de visión estable. Por ello casi no hay motivos para elegir el modelo AMD.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST - 03/23/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabado
81 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
79%
Ratón
94%
Conectividad
48 / 80 → 59%
Peso
66 / 35-78 → 72%
Battería
82%
Pantalla
71%
Rendimiento de juegos
54 / 68 → 79%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
65 / 87 → 75%
Temperatura
94%
Ruido
94%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Cámara
27 / 85 → 32%
Médio
69%
78%
Convertible - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Breve análisis del Convertible Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD)
Sascha Mölck, 2017-03-28 (Update: 2017-03-28)