Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve análisis del Smartphone Acer Liquid Zest Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 414 cd/m²
Contraste: 1255:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Z630S IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Leagoo Shark 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Archos 50 Power IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 12% | -26% | 12% | -1% | 51% | |
| Brightness middle | 414 | 350 -15% | 471 14% | 586 42% | 304 -27% | 554 34% |
| Brightness | 420 | 345 -18% | 465 11% | 566 35% | 311 -26% | 552 31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 84 -11% | 82 -13% | 84 -11% | 83 -12% | 96 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.27 18% | 0.9 -173% | 0.57 -73% | 0.31 6% | |
| Contrast | 1255 | 1296 3% | 523 -58% | 1028 -18% | 981 -22% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.1 | 4.7 42% | 7.1 12% | 4.2 48% | 5.9 27% | 1.59 80% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.8 | 8.5 38% | 17 -23% | 8.4 39% | 14.3 -4% | 2.56 81% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.6 | 5.6 42% | 7.5 22% | 6.3 34% | 4.6 52% | 2.01 79% |
| Gamma | 2 110% | 1.84 120% | 2.23 99% | 2.39 92% | 2.51 88% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 7754 84% | 6795 96% | 8261 79% | 6614 98% | 7088 92% | 6321 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 36 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 46 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Acer Liquid Z630S | |
| Leagoo Shark 1 | |
| Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL | |
| Archos 50 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Liquid Z630S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Archos 50 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.25 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.83 / 2.06 / 2.08 Watt |
| Carga |
3.53 / 4.49 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -39% | -52% | -26% | -43% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 1.82 -119% | 0.59 29% | 1.15 -39% | 1.66 -100% | 0.63 24% |
| Idle Average * | 2.06 | 2.35 -14% | 3.22 -56% | 2.09 -1% | 2.88 -40% | 1.1 47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.08 | 2.6 -25% | 3.45 -66% | 2.17 -4% | 3.46 -66% | 1.56 25% |
| Load Average * | 3.53 | 3.69 -5% | 6.93 -96% | 5.38 -52% | 3.96 -12% | 5.95 -69% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.49 | 5.98 -33% | 7.59 -69% | 6.08 -35% | 4.34 3% | 6.7 -49% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh | Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL 5000 mAh | Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 815 | 681 -16% | 542 -33% | 959 18% | 592 -27% | 732 -10% |
Pro
Contra
El Acer Liquid Zest Plus se nos presentó en el test como un smartphone de gama media decente del nivel de precios más bajo.
Los usuarios que dependan de un gran aguante de batería descubrirán en el Acer Liquid Zest Plus una buena alternativa a smartphones con aguante existentes en el mercado. Los demás pueden encontrar modelos mejores y de más calidad, tales como ZTE Blade V7 o Honor 5C, por un PVP de unos 200 Euros.
Tenemos que destacar en particular el panel IPS de gran contraste, la decente calidad de la reproducción de música por altavoces y por clavija 3.5-mm, la funcionalidad dual-SIM, y el gran aguante de batería en el test WiFi. Esto último, empero, se logra a costa del rendimiento (SoC débil) y una configuración técnica superior (720p vs. 1080p) - ninguna de esas características son adecuadas hoy día para un dispositivo de 5.5" y 200 Euros. Lo que es más, a la carcasa de plástico le falta algo de calidad al tacto comparada con smartphones de metal o vidrio.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
- 09/14/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
