Breve análisis del Smartphone BQ Aquaris X
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 91 %
Brillo con batería: 675 cd/m²
Contraste: 1144:1 (Negro: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
| BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -32% | -8% | 21% | 29% | 18% | 1% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 675 | 458 -32% | 512 -24% | 660 -2% | 539 -20% | 509 -25% | 507 -25% | 482 -29% |
| Brightness | 702 | 473 -33% | 501 -29% | 625 -11% | 542 -23% | 511 -27% | 509 -27% | 472 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 94 3% | 92 1% | 93 2% | 93 2% | 95 4% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.59 | 0.51 14% | 0.36 39% | 0.29 51% | 0.36 39% | 0.33 44% | ||
| Contrast | 1144 | 898 -22% | 1422 24% | 2276 99% | 1408 23% | 1461 28% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 7.1 -58% | 6.4 -42% | 4.9 -9% | 1.6 64% | 2.2 51% | 5.1 -13% | 3.2 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 14.5 -59% | 10.9 -20% | 7.6 16% | 2.6 71% | 5.8 36% | 9 1% | 5.4 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 10.5 -64% | 7.2 -13% | 4.8 25% | 1.5 77% | 2 69% | 6.1 5% | 2.2 66% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7478 87% | 8951 73% | 7904 82% | 7357 88% | 6422 101% | 6768 96% | 8143 80% | 6581 99% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 39 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 36.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 49 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei P10 Lite | |
| HTC U11 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57) | |
| BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play (Chrome 53) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| BQ Aquaris X | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Nokia 6 | Lenovo Moto G5 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Huawei P10 Lite | HTC U11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 11% | -3% | 26% | -15% | 42% | 24% | 170% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 266.4 | 270.5 2% | 273.1 3% | 230.6 -13% | 182 -32% | 254.8 -4% | 264.3 -1% | 717 169% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 75.3 | 139.6 85% | 77.1 2% | 45.6 -39% | 77.1 2% | 73.1 -3% | 129.2 72% | 206.4 174% |
| Random Read 4KB | 37.47 | 37.97 1% | 33.8 -10% | 37.6 0% | 22.41 -40% | 38.78 3% | 72.5 93% | 91.4 144% |
| Random Write 4KB | 11.85 | 12.07 2% | 11.34 -4% | 37.9 220% | 12.13 2% | 45.58 285% | 19.36 63% | 80 575% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.3 ? | 78.7 ? -7% | 84.6 0% | 78.5 ? -7% | 73.7 ? -13% | 74.6 ? -12% | 53.4 ? -37% | 68.8 ? -18% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.6 ? | 49.77 ? -20% | 56.6 -10% | 58 ? -7% | 56 ? -11% | 50.6 ? -19% | 32.7 ? -48% | 46.25 ? -26% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BQ Aquaris X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.12 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.12 / 2.16 / 2.18 Watt |
| Carga |
2.94 / 5.1 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 8% | 9% | 32% | 48% | 13% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.12 | 0.67 40% | 0.63 44% | 0.73 35% | 0.64 43% | 0.51 54% | 0.38 66% | 0.73 35% |
| Idle Average * | 2.16 | 1.7 21% | 1.75 19% | 1.64 24% | 1.36 37% | 0.87 60% | 1.87 13% | 1.96 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.18 | 1.78 18% | 1.87 14% | 1.68 23% | 1.4 36% | 0.9 59% | 1.92 12% | 1.98 9% |
| Load Average * | 2.94 | 4.42 -50% | 3.56 -21% | 3.46 -18% | 2.53 14% | 1.69 43% | 3.82 -30% | 4.82 -64% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.1 | 6.3 -24% | 5.85 -15% | 6.13 -20% | 3.63 29% | 4 22% | 4.9 4% | 7.15 -40% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Huawei P10 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | ||||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 592 | 730 23% | 670 13% | 561 -5% | 843 42% | 824 39% | 665 12% | 560 -5% |
Pro
Contra
No pudimos encontrar muchas debilidades en el BQ Aquaris X - más bien lo contrario: El smartphone gama media español ofrece un interesante perfil de puntos fuertes y débiles para este nivel de precios. Ni la versión Pro - que cuesta 100€ más - no puede competir con nuestro modelo de pruebas en el brillo de display, la precisión de color, y la temperatura del color. Los valores de transferencia menores del test Wi-Fi podrían haberse arreglado con una actualización software.
El gama media Aquaris X definitivamente no es una mala elección para los amigos de Android Vainilla.
Nos gustó mucho el brillantísimo display IPS del BQ Aquaris X, así como el veloz módulo Wi-Fi, el preciso posicionamiento GPS, la buena calidad de cámara de multitud de ajustes, y la posibilidad de usar dos SIMs simultáneamente. Además, el fabricante ha evitado hacer demasiados añadidos al software y no ha añadido ningún bloatware.
La calidad de la trasera de plástico podría haber sido algo mejor y un dispositivo con un PVR de 300€ debería haber tenido teclas de navegación iluminadas bajo el display.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
BQ Aquaris X
- 09/27/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
