Breve análisis del smartphone BQ Aquaris X Pro
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 88 %
Brillo con batería: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 898:1 (Negro: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
| BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 20% | 47% | 17% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 485 6% | 539 18% | 451 -2% | 328 -28% |
| Brightness | 473 | 481 2% | 542 15% | 443 -6% | 334 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 93 6% | 93 6% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.5 2% | 0.4 22% | ||
| Contrast | 898 | 970 8% | 1128 26% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.2 41% | 1.6 77% | 5.4 24% | 4.6 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.5 | 7.9 46% | 2.6 82% | 9.9 32% | 14.7 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.5 | 4.8 54% | 1.5 86% | 6.7 36% | 2.8 73% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.33 94% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 8951 73% | 7568 86% | 6422 101% | 8262 79% | 6612 98% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 35.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 17.2 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 45 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Honor 8 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 8 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | Huawei Nova Plus | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Honor 8 | ZTE Axon 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 2% | -19% | 7% | 52% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270.5 | 241.6 -11% | 182 -33% | 247.5 -9% | 406.5 50% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 139.6 | 82.1 -41% | 77.1 -45% | 119.3 -15% | 150.9 8% |
| Random Read 4KB | 37.97 | 35.64 -6% | 22.41 -41% | 34.16 -10% | 121.1 219% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.07 | 30.12 150% | 12.13 0% | 31.5 161% | 16.22 34% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 78.7 | 41.64 -47% | 73.7 -6% | 53.7 -32% | 78.4 0% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 49.77 | 33.32 -33% | 56 13% | 23.59 -53% | 51.3 3% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 57 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.67 / 1.7 / 1.78 Watt |
| Carga |
4.42 / 6.3 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 26% | -9% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.49 27% | 0.64 4% | 0.78 -16% | 0.64 4% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 1.63 4% | 1.36 20% | 1.89 -11% | 0.84 51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.78 | 1.76 1% | 1.4 21% | 2.02 -13% | 0.87 51% |
| Load Average * | 4.42 | 2.98 33% | 2.53 43% | 5.28 -19% | 6.02 -36% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.3 | 4.99 21% | 3.63 42% | 5.44 14% | 10.45 -66% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 20% | 46% | -17% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1840 | 2048 11% | 2418 31% | 1487 -19% | 1735 -6% |
| H.264 | 644 | 732 14% | 984 53% | 526 -18% | 704 9% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 730 | 820 12% | 843 15% | 499 -32% | 411 -44% |
| Load | 254 | 366 44% | 467 84% | 255 0% | 245 -4% |
Pro
Contra
El BQ Aquaris X Pro es un smartphone de gama media muy decente que no tiene problemas para mantenerse al día con la competencia. Todo lo contrario: gracias a su robusta carcasa de metal / vidrio de alta calidad, el smartphone de 5,2" se puede confundir fácilmente con un dispositivo insignia premium. Lo mismo debe decirse del display IPS de alta resolución con su alto brillo y una resolución FHD nítida.
Además, el Aquaris X Pro ofrece una cámara muy buena de 12 MP, un lector de huellas dactilares fiable y rápido y un rendimiento general muy alto, resultando en una juegabilidad suave incluso de los juegos más exigentes rematado con un sensor GPS exacto, carga rápida y un puerto USB tipo C.
El BQ Aquaris X Pro es un muy buen smartphone con beneficios que sobrepasan claramente sus limitaciones.
Sólo hay algunas desventajas que vale la pena anotar, y están lejos de cortar el rollo. Piense en ellos más como pequeños defectos cosméticos.
Por un lado, la ranura de tarjeta SIM secundaria comparte su espacio con el lector de tarjetas MicroSD - solo puedes utilizar uno u otro. La precisión de color de la pantalla es mediocre en el mejor de los casos, pero sólo se nota con el equipo de medición profesional y no a simple vista. Además, el Aquaris X Pro solo tiene un altavoz mono, aunque algo adecuado.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
BQ Aquaris X Pro
- 07/24/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
