Breve análisis del Smartphone Coolpad Modena 2
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play |
|
iluminación: 86 %
Brillo con batería: 482 cd/m²
Contraste: 765:1 (Negro: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.91
Coolpad Modena 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Coolpad Modena IPS, 960x540, 5.5" | UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.7" | Archos 50 Power IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 12% | 30% | 29% | 11% | 1% | 5% | 11% | 34% | |
Brightness middle | 482 | 345 -28% | 522 8% | 418 -13% | 312 -35% | 360 -25% | 304 -37% | 412 -15% | 485 1% |
Brightness | 468 | 338 -28% | 498 6% | 410 -12% | 302 -35% | 358 -24% | 311 -34% | 414 -12% | 490 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 93 8% | 86 0% | 85 -1% | 79 -8% | 87 1% | 83 -3% | 94 9% | 92 7% |
Black Level * | 0.63 | 0.29 54% | 0.23 63% | 0.31 51% | 0.15 76% | 0.45 29% | 0.31 51% | 0.42 33% | |
Contrast | 765 | 1190 56% | 2270 197% | 1348 76% | 2080 172% | 800 5% | 981 28% | 981 28% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 5.59 14% | 6.9 -6% | 4.4 32% | 8.2 -26% | 6.8 -5% | 5.9 9% | 5.6 14% | 2.1 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.4 | 10.58 15% | 12.3 1% | 6.5 48% | 16.5 -33% | 11.3 9% | 14.3 -15% | 9.7 22% | 5.5 56% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 6.75 8% | 9.2 -26% | 3.6 51% | 9.2 -26% | 6.2 15% | 4.6 37% | 6.9 5% | 2.6 64% |
Gamma | 1.91 115% | 2.38 92% | 2.38 92% | 2.36 93% | 2.29 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.51 88% | 2.4 92% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7249 90% | 8290 78% | 8687 75% | 6993 93% | 9017 72% | 7975 82% | 7088 92% | 8422 77% | 6843 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.14 | ||||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida | |
↘ 18 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
58 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 36 ms subida | |
↘ 22 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 94 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Coolpad Modena | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Coolpad Modena | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Coolpad Modena | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Coolpad Modena | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Coolpad Modena | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Archos 50 Power | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Coolpad Modena 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
UMI Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.06 / 0.15 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.64 / 1.96 / 1.98 Watt |
Carga |
4.99 / 5.48 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | 14% | -19% | 26% | 6% | -48% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.79 -23% | 1.02 -59% | 0.84 -31% | 0.63 2% | 0.68 -6% | 1.66 -159% | 0.68 -6% |
Idle Average * | 1.96 | 1.51 23% | 1.53 22% | 1.94 1% | 1.37 30% | 2.2 -12% | 2.88 -47% | 1.58 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.98 | 1.63 18% | 1.62 18% | 2.07 -5% | 1.71 14% | 2.26 -14% | 3.46 -75% | 1.61 19% |
Load Average * | 4.99 | 3.37 32% | 2.91 42% | 5.88 -18% | 2.82 43% | 3.47 30% | 3.96 21% | 3.36 33% |
Load Maximum * | 5.48 | 4.67 15% | 2.93 47% | 7.67 -40% | 3.36 39% | 3.71 32% | 4.34 21% | 3.91 29% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | |||||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 616 19% | 588 14% | 638 23% | 517 0% | 397 -23% | 592 14% | 630 22% | 407 -21% |
Pro
Contra
El Coolpad Modena 2 no está mal, pero los rivales ofrecen más por el mismo valor - este es nuestro veredicto breve y conciso. Comparado con su predecessor, el fabricante chino no ha mejorado ningún aspecto de forma correcta, porque algunos puntos como la duración de batería, el rendimiento de la GPU, el contraste y la precisión de color del panel IPS del Modena 2 son peores que antes. Creemos que la combinación de un SoC MediaTek de gama baja, 2 GB de RAM y almacenamiento eMMC lento no es suficientemente bueno para los 180 euros que cuesta.
Sigue ocurriendo lo mismo: La segunda generación de Modena no nos convence - la actualización no ofrece mejoras suficientes.
El Coolpad Modena 2 no es una mala elección si buscas un smartphone LTE con una pantalla grande y brillante. Aún así tanto el UMi Max como el Honor 5C ofrecen mejores características por un precio similar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Coolpad Modena 2
-
11/08/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich