Breve análisis del Smartphone Huawei Nova
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 493 cd/m²
Contraste: 1120:1 (Negro: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.39
| Huawei Nova IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | -13% | -30% | 18% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 493 | 509 3% | 658 33% | 328 -33% | 378 -23% | 485 -2% |
| Brightness | 485 | 511 5% | 633 31% | 334 -31% | 380 -22% | 481 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 93 -1% | 88 -6% | 91 -3% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.66 -50% | 0.5 -14% | |||
| Contrast | 1120 | 997 -11% | 970 -13% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.2 48% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 4.2 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.6 | 5.8 12% | 9.1 -38% | 14.7 -123% | 3.09 53% | 7.9 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2 47% | 5.8 -53% | 2.8 26% | 1.86 51% | 4.8 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 7438 87% | 6768 96% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 7568 86% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 2500 Hz | ≤ 1 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 2500 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 1 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 2500 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 98 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 58.8 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 42.8 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Nova | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Nova | Lenovo Moto Z Play | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | ZTE Axon 7 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | Huawei Nova Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 30% | 54% | -38% | -19% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 248.3 | 254.8 3% | 282 14% | 406.5 64% | 209.4 -16% | 241.6 -3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 75 | 73.1 -3% | 188 151% | 150.9 101% | 60.4 -19% | 82.1 9% |
| Random Read 4KB | 38.19 | 38.78 2% | 74 94% | 121.1 217% | 22.9 -40% | 35.64 -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 44.63 | 45.58 2% | 7.4 -83% | 16.22 -64% | 11.2 -75% | 30.12 -33% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.5 | 74.6 -6% | 79.2 0% | 78.4 -1% | 41.64 -48% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.69 | 50.6 6% | 50.1 5% | 51.3 8% | 33.32 -30% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 53 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Nova audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.61 / 1.83 / 1.86 Watt |
| Carga |
3.71 / 5.19 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 39% | -12% | -12% | -3% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.51 16% | 0.83 -36% | 0.64 -5% | 0.96 -57% | 0.49 20% |
| Idle Average * | 1.83 | 0.87 52% | 2.11 -15% | 0.84 54% | 1.64 10% | 1.63 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 0.9 52% | 2.12 -14% | 0.87 53% | 1.71 8% | 1.76 5% |
| Load Average * | 3.71 | 1.69 54% | 3.41 8% | 6.02 -62% | 2.98 20% | 2.98 20% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.19 | 4 23% | 5.46 -5% | 10.45 -101% | 5.08 2% | 4.99 4% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Nova 3020 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 49% | 1% | -22% | 9% | 5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1870 | 2540 36% | 1502 -20% | 1735 -7% | 2323 24% | 2048 10% |
| H.264 | 717 | 1190 66% | 905 26% | 704 -2% | 672 -6% | 732 2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 873 | 824 -6% | 797 -9% | 411 -53% | 626 -28% | 820 -6% |
| Load | 328 | 652 99% | 352 7% | 245 -25% | 483 47% | 366 12% |
Pro
Contra
Al igual que el Huawei Nova Plus, el Huawei Nova es un muy buen smartphone con casi ningún inconveniente. Un panel Full HD muy brillante, carcasa rígida y de alta calidad, USB-C, soporte para dos SIMs y un fiable lector de huellas se encuentran entre sus puntos fuertes. A pesar de que la cámara de 12 megapíxeles tiene menos resolución que la del Nova Plus y no tiene estabilizador de imágenes, toma buenas fotos y videos - los últimos incluso en formato Ultra HD lo que es muy raro de ver en la gama media. A pesar de su batería menor, el Huawei Nova tiene una buena duración de batería. También nos ha gustado que soporta más bandas de frecuencia UMTS que el Nova Plus y tiene un índice SAR menor.
Huawei ha creado un gran dispositivo. Quitando el tamaño de pantalla, casi no hay diferencias con el Nova Plus 80 euros más caro.
Podríamos calcar la lista de defectos del Huawei's Nova Plus. En lugar de dos ranuras dedicadas, una de ellas es compartida entre SIM y microSD. El rendimiento de la WiFi no es el mejor debido a la falta de la soporte para redes de 5 GHz. Además las aplicaciones no se pueden mover a la tarjeta micro-SD. Aquellos que puedan vivir con estos inconvenientes y quieran ahorrar 80 euros respecto al Huawei's Nova Plus, encontrarán en el Huawei Nova un smartphone recomendable que, según su fabricante y al igual que su hermano de 5.5 pulgadas, se actualizará en breve a Android 7.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Huawei Nova
- 01/09/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
