Breve análisis del Smartphone Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 393 cd/m²
Contraste: 936:1 (Negro: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y6 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y7 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Honor 6A IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Nokia 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 PLS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 41% | 13% | 3% | 10% | -10% | 21% | 30% | |
| Brightness middle | 393 | 438 11% | 467 19% | 425 8% | 480 22% | 481 22% | 502 28% | 530 35% |
| Brightness | 388 | 432 11% | 456 18% | 425 10% | 462 19% | 469 21% | 494 27% | 536 38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 90 0% | 92 2% | 93 3% | 94 4% | 84 -7% | 89 -1% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.13 69% | 0.39 7% | 0.37 12% | 0.43 -2% | 0.22 48% | 0.35 17% | |
| Contrast | 936 | 3369 260% | 1197 28% | 1149 23% | 1116 19% | 2186 134% | 1434 53% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4.8 17% | 4.3 26% | 4.7 19% | 5.2 10% | 8.1 -40% | 4.6 21% | 2.6 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 11.4 -31% | 6.8 22% | 8.3 5% | 8 8% | 15.4 -77% | 8 8% | 5.1 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 3.2 -7% | 3.5 -17% | 4.6 -53% | 3.1 -3% | 8.5 -183% | 2.5 17% | 2.7 10% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.35 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.4 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.29 96% | 2.04 108% |
| CCT | 7060 92% | 7090 92% | 7273 89% | 7445 87% | 6688 97% | 9014 72% | 6351 102% | 6206 105% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 62 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 40.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 60 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 | |
| Huawei Y7 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 6A | |
| Nokia 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Nokia 3 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 (Chrome Version 61) | |
| Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60) | |
| Honor 6A (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 | Huawei Y6 2017 | Huawei Y7 | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | Honor 6A | Nokia 3 | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 22% | -6% | 41% | 4% | -19% | -1% | 170% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 143.4 | 202.6 41% | 119.4 -17% | 194.4 36% | 123.6 -14% | 181 26% | 177.7 24% | 797 456% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 50.7 | 66.9 32% | 33.2 -35% | 42 -17% | 64.1 26% | 34 -33% | 51 1% | 205.9 306% |
| Random Read 4KB | 45.65 | 25.93 -43% | 53.2 17% | 19.15 -58% | 50.2 10% | 17.7 -61% | 24 -47% | 122.5 168% |
| Random Write 4KB | 6.78 | 20.54 203% | 6.9 2% | 29.4 334% | 6.94 2% | 5.5 -19% | 9.5 40% | 14.55 115% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.4 ? | 48.4 -42% | 82.5 ? -1% | 66.3 -21% | 83.9 ? 1% | 64.3 -23% | 70.3 -16% | 67.9 ? -19% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.1 ? | 26.4 -59% | 62.6 ? -2% | 46.6 -27% | 63.1 ? -2% | 62.9 -2% | 59.6 -7% | 59.3 ? -7% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 6A audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.6 / 2.02 / 2.08 Watt |
| Carga |
5.31 / 6.41 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 3020 mAh | Huawei Y7 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Honor 6A 3020 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 25% | 9% | -27% | 27% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.57 5% | 0.89 -48% | 1.33 -122% | 0.67 -12% | 0.82 -37% |
| Idle Average * | 2.02 | 1.61 20% | 1.87 7% | 2.53 -25% | 1.35 33% | 1.94 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.08 | 1.62 22% | 1.98 5% | 2.54 -22% | 1.39 33% | 2.06 1% |
| Load Average * | 5.31 | 3.09 42% | 3.04 43% | 3.84 28% | 3.1 42% | 3.31 38% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.41 | 4.26 34% | 4.01 37% | 6.12 5% | 4.02 37% | 3.89 39% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Huawei Y6 Pro 2017 3020 mAh | Huawei Y6 2017 3000 mAh | Huawei Y7 4000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Honor 6A 3020 mAh | Nokia 3 2630 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 2400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 668 | 654 -2% | 716 7% | 788 18% | 790 18% | 552 -17% | 722 8% |
Pro
Contra
El Huawei Y6 Pro (2017) es un smartphone básico compacto y bonito que no te costará un ojo. Por unos $200 tienes un dispositivo biene quipado con 16 GB de almacenamiento, 2 GB de RAM, y una carcasa de metal bien hecha. Además, el aguante de batería es decente gracias a su gran batería de 3,020 mAh.
Por desgracia, Huawei no ha logrado atajar algunos de los defectos de sus hermanos no-Pro, y los ha continuado en el modelo Pro también. Por ejemplo, el rendimiento Wi-Fi sigue siendo inferior, y la selección de bandas LTE soportadas es relativamente magra. El display sigue igual de oscuro, ¡pero por algún motivo su contraste y punto de negro son aún más bajos que en el Y6 (2017)! No tenemos ni idea de qué es lo que hizo que vieran el display como adecuado para un dispositivo “Pro”.
El mayor problema que tuvimos fue el rendimiento de sistema malo y errático. La UI de Huawei EMUI 5.1 no va tan fluida en un Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 lo que resulta en trastabilles y lag regulares.
A pesar de los defectos en display y rendimiento, el Huawei Y6 Pro (2017) es en general un paquete decente por unos $200. Si merece la subida de precios respecto a su hermano no-Pro depende de cada uno.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Huawei Y6 Pro 2017
- 11/06/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
