Breve análisis del Smartphone LG X Cam
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
|
iluminación: 94 %
Brillo con batería: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1448:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.22
LG X Cam IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Lenovo Moto G4 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus X Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -21% | 12% | -3% | -6% | 25% | |
Brightness middle | 362 | 409 13% | 724 100% | 312 -14% | 505 40% | 784 117% |
Brightness | 348 | 411 18% | 723 108% | 314 -10% | 468 34% | 774 122% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 96 2% | 87 -7% | 91 -3% | 88 -6% | 91 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.38 -52% | 0.71 -184% | 0.74 -196% | 0.43 -72% | |
Contrast | 1448 | 1076 -26% | 1020 -30% | 682 -53% | 1823 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 9.4 -38% | 4.5 34% | 6.28 8% | 4.1 40% | 6.5 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.9 | 17.6 -48% | 8.4 29% | 5.8 51% | 11.7 2% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.4 | 11.6 -38% | 4.9 42% | 8.24 2% | 4.9 42% | 8 5% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.44 90% | 2.12 104% | 2.5 88% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 8242 79% | 9597 68% | 6496 100% | 8145 80% | 7116 91% | 8699 75% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.08 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.46 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 13 ms subida | |
↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
48 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida | |
↘ 27 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 80 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
LG X Cam | |
ZTE Blade V7 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 | |
OnePlus X | |
Huawei P9 Lite | |
LG G5 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG X Cam audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 46.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.22 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.64 / 1.38 / 1.43 Watt |
Carga |
3.99 / 4.49 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
LG X Cam 2500 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 3000 mAh | OnePlus X mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -34% | 23% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 0.73 -14% | 0.65 -2% | 0.6 6% | 0.73 -14% |
Idle Average * | 1.38 | 0.92 33% | 1.89 -37% | 0.91 34% | 2.09 -51% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.43 | 0.93 35% | 1.92 -34% | 1.12 22% | 2.11 -48% |
Load Average * | 3.99 | 4.47 -12% | 5.28 -32% | 3.04 24% | 4.15 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 4.49 | 5.96 -33% | 7.45 -66% | 3.2 29% | 5.05 -12% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
LG X Cam 2500 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 3000 mAh | OnePlus X mAh | Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 457 | 519 14% | 698 53% | 549 20% | 604 32% |
Pro
Contra
El modelo de gama media LG X Cam puntúa en nuestro test con un panel Full HD IPS de alto contraste y su buen manejo. Está bien construido, pero sólo ofrece una carcasa de plástico de tacto barato para este nivel de precios - la competencia de gama media hecha de vidrio (OnePlus X) o metales (ZTE Blade V7) dan una impresión de mucha más calidad.
Comparado con la competencia, el LG X Cam ofrece demasiado poco para su precio actual de unos 280 Euros. Sin embargo, podría ser una alternativa interesante para algunos compradores cuando el mercado se desarrolle correspondientemente (reducción de precio) - pero no realmente a nuestro parecer con este precio actual.
El punto fuerte del dispositivo y la característica que le da nombre es su doble cámara trasera, compuesta por un módulo estándar (75°) y un gran angular de 120°. La calidad de la fotografía de sendas cámaras es buena, pero claramente inferior a la del LG G5 (que también trae una doble cámara) - a un PVR de 300 Euros, LG ciertamente podría haber instalado una lente igual a la de su dispositivo insignia siendo como es el único gancho comercial de su smartphone de gama media.
También hay que hacer sacrificios en el rendimiento del procesador. El SoC MediaTek del LG X Cam no puede competir con el rendimiento de otros smartphones de gama media - lo mismo pasa con la velocidad de la memoria flash eMMC de 16 GB. Lo que es más, la calidad de sonido del altavoz instalado en el LG X Cam no es particularmente convincente.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
LG X Cam
-
08/23/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich