Breve análisis del Smartphone UMi Super Euro Edition
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus |
|
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 418 cd/m²
Contraste: 1348:1 (Negro: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.36
UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo ZUK Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -14% | -46% | -93% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 418 | 512 22% | 414 -1% | 552 32% | 535 28% |
Brightness | 410 | 502 22% | 420 2% | 526 28% | 521 27% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 84 -1% | 94 11% | 91 7% | 85 0% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.58 -87% | 0.33 -6% | 0.64 -106% | 0.43 -39% |
Contrast | 1348 | 883 -34% | 1255 -7% | 863 -36% | 1244 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 3.8 14% | 8.1 -84% | 11 -150% | 4.88 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 11.2 -72% | 13.8 -112% | 20.8 -220% | 8.66 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 2.7 25% | 9.6 -167% | 14.3 -297% | 5.2 -44% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.09 105% | 2 110% | 2.21 100% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6993 93% | 6076 107% | 7754 84% | 12996 50% | 7766 84% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
19 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 9 ms subida | |
↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 38 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (21 ms). | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida | |
↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
Sequential Write 256KB (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
Random Read 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
Random Write 4KB (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5X | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (ordenar por valor) | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Blackview R7 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
UMI Super Euro Edition audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ZUK Z2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Blackview R7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.34 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.84 / 1.94 / 2.07 Watt |
Carga |
5.88 / 7.67 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | 15% | -53% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.84 | 1.31 -56% | 0.83 1% | 1.83 -118% | 0.87 -4% |
Idle Average * | 1.94 | 2.03 -5% | 2.06 -6% | 3.21 -65% | 2.08 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.07 | 2.08 -0% | 2.08 -0% | 3.45 -67% | 2.22 -7% |
Load Average * | 5.88 | 5.45 7% | 3.53 40% | 5.67 4% | 5.26 11% |
Load Maximum * | 7.67 | 6.75 12% | 4.49 41% | 9.16 -19% | 6.34 17% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Honor 5X 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -14% | 28% | -35% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 1254 | 1053 -16% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 638 | 546 -14% | 815 28% | 412 -35% | 643 1% |
H.264 | 602 | ||||
Load | 144 |
Pro
Contra
El UMi Super está por encima de la media en algunas áreas y en la media en otras - pero también tiene ciertos rasgos que sencillamente son inaceptables en un dispositivo que se usa a diario. El color azul es atrevido y atractivo - pero dado que es una edición limitada, no habrá muchos usuarios que puedan comprar el UMi Super Euro Edition. La mayoría de usuarios tendrá que conformarse con plata u oro. No obstante: 200 Euros por un smartphone con carcasa de metal y RAM generosa - es sorprendente. El hecho de que ya hayan anunciado la actualización a Android 7, el software no traiga cambios inútiles, y la ausencia de bloatware hablan a favor del fabricante.
La comunicación con el smartphone va bien en su mayor parte. Las cámaras no son precisamente de primera, pero producen fotos decentes. El display no es absolutamente brillante, pero es fácil de configurar y trae una gran precisión de color así como muy buen contraste. El rendimiento es más que adecuado, el altavoz suena bastante agradable, y el aguante de batería es impresionante.
El gran defecto es la pantalla táctil, que no es nada precisa y hace que manejar el smartphone sea más difícil de lo que debería. ¿Quién quiere manejar un teléfono que no acepta las entradas de forma fiable? La carcasa también se calienta, el micrófono no impresiona, y los juegos más exigentes se trastabillan.
Con todo, el UMi Super es un smartphone bien equipado con problemas de calidad menores. El mayor problema es la pantalla táctil, que hace miserable manejar el smartphone.
Uno de los mayores competidores es el más potente Lenovo ZUK Z2.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
UMI Super Euro Edition
-
09/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer