Breve análisis del Smartphone Vernee Mars
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
SD Card Reader | |
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Vernee Mars | |
Honor 5C | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Honor 5C | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Vernee Mars |
|
iluminación: 85 %
Brillo con batería: 345 cd/m²
Contraste: 2464:1 (Negro: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.47
Vernee Mars IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Coolpad Modena 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -20% | -15% | 1% | -23% | -41% | -23% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 345 | 412 19% | 312 -10% | 522 51% | 515 49% | 482 40% | 414 20% | 696 102% |
Brightness | 339 | 414 22% | 302 -11% | 498 47% | 498 47% | 468 38% | 420 24% | 680 101% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 94 11% | 79 -7% | 86 1% | 93 9% | 86 1% | 94 11% | 93 9% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.42 -200% | 0.15 -7% | 0.23 -64% | 0.49 -250% | 0.63 -350% | 0.33 -136% | 0.42 -200% |
Contrast | 2464 | 981 -60% | 2080 -16% | 2270 -8% | 1051 -57% | 765 -69% | 1255 -49% | 1657 -33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 5.6 21% | 8.2 -15% | 6.9 3% | 6.2 13% | 6.5 8% | 8.1 -14% | 4.3 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.9 | 9.7 30% | 16.5 -19% | 12.3 12% | 11.4 18% | 12.4 11% | 13.8 1% | 9.4 32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 6.9 -3% | 9.2 -37% | 9.2 -37% | 7.4 -10% | 7.3 -9% | 9.6 -43% | 4.8 28% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.4 92% | 2.29 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 1.91 115% | 2 110% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7711 84% | 8422 77% | 9017 72% | 8687 75% | 8664 75% | 7249 90% | 7754 84% | 7255 90% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
40 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 14 ms subida | |
↘ 26 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 97 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
62 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 21 ms subida | |
↘ 41 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 96 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8774 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Vernee Mars audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.31 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.02 / 1.69 / 1.82 Watt |
Carga |
4.39 / 6.79 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 23% | 30% | 22% | 4% | 3% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.02 | 0.68 33% | 0.63 38% | 1.02 -0% | 0.89 13% | 0.64 37% | 0.83 19% |
Idle Average * | 1.69 | 1.58 7% | 1.37 19% | 1.53 9% | 2.07 -22% | 1.96 -16% | 2.06 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.82 | 1.61 12% | 1.71 6% | 1.62 11% | 2.15 -18% | 1.98 -9% | 2.08 -14% |
Load Average * | 4.39 | 3.36 23% | 2.82 36% | 2.91 34% | 3.46 21% | 4.99 -14% | 3.53 20% |
Load Maximum * | 6.79 | 3.91 42% | 3.36 51% | 2.93 57% | 5.18 24% | 5.48 19% | 4.49 34% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 427 | 630 48% | 517 21% | 588 38% | 584 37% | 518 21% | 815 91% |
Pro
Contra
El Vernee Mars es un smartphone atractivo y muy bien construido. Con un PVP actual de entre 180 y 190 Euros (importación), el asequible gama media ofrece una relación precio-rendimiento atractiva y puntúa con un panel IPS de alta resolución y mucho contraste, un rendimiento de sistema decente, y una configuración exhuberante.
A cambio hay que hacer sacrificios en la calidad del altavoz (respecto a modelos rivales) y el rendimiento del GPS. Lo que es más, resulta relativamente difícil sacar buenas fotos con la cámara principal de 13MP - un estabilizador de imagen óptico habría sido una ventaja genial aquí.
El Vernee Mars es un buen smartphone en el segmento medio de precios, pero le falta un gancho de venta único - el Honor 5C con un perfil de dispositivo muy similar, por ejemplo, se puede comprar al mismo precio en Alemania. Esto ya hace dudar sobre si merece la pena importar.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Vernee Mars
-
11/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich