Breve análisis del convertible HP Spectre x360 13 (7500U, 4K UHD)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 302.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1210:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx LG Philips LGD054D, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) APPA033, , 13.3", 2560x1600 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 23% | -30% | -9% | -8% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 99.2 43% | 47.32 -32% | 62.2 -10% | 64.6 -7% | 65.4 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.8 | 99.9 3% | 71.1 -27% | 90.1 -7% | 88.8 -8% | 90.4 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 87.6 23% | 48.83 -31% | 63.5 -11% | 64.8 -9% | 65.8 -7% |
| Response Times | -39% | -9% | 8% | -7% | 17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 47.2 ? -12% | 48 ? -14% | 46 ? -10% | 46 ? -10% | 33.2 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 53 ? -66% | 32.8 ? -3% | 24 ? 25% | 33 ? -3% | 28 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 1042 ? | |||||
| Screen | 19% | -50% | -58% | -33% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 302.6 | 569 88% | 322.6 7% | 348 15% | 404 34% | 334.6 11% |
| Brightness | 282 | 542 92% | 306 9% | 310 10% | 382 35% | 319 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 90 8% | 91 10% | 80 -4% | 91 10% | 90 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.56 -124% | 0.19 24% | 0.25 -0% | 0.35 -40% | 0.336 -34% |
| Contrast | 1210 | 1016 -16% | 1698 40% | 1392 15% | 1154 -5% | 996 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.4 42% | 7.7 -221% | 7.86 -228% | 5.37 -124% | 6.21 -159% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.9 | 2.9 41% | 11.1 -127% | 13.43 -174% | 9.46 -93% | 12 -145% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.8 36% | 7.9 -182% | 8.25 -195% | 6.44 -130% | 7.71 -175% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.88 76% | 2.05 107% | 2.52 87% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6333 103% | 6877 95% | 7044 92% | 6834 95% | 6738 96% | 6458 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.5 | 78.4 20% | 44.1 -33% | 58 -11% | 58 -11% | 58.6 -11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.1 | 99.3 2% | 69.9 -28% | 90 -7% | 89 -8% | 90 -7% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 1% /
12% | -30% /
-41% | -20% /
-39% | -16% /
-25% | -14% /
-34% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 84 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 42 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 20.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 64 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360-4764 | |
| Dell Latitude 7280 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3023 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4432 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3706 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple SSD SD0256F | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -25% | -27% | -6% | -4% | |
| Read Seq | 2065 | 1352 -35% | 1206 -42% | 1412 -32% | 1090 -47% |
| Write Seq | 1550 | 1111 -28% | 629 -59% | 578 -63% | 1088 -30% |
| Read 512 | 865 | 880 2% | 966 12% | 701 -19% | 753 -13% |
| Write 512 | 1229 | 1023 -17% | 410.7 -67% | 580 -53% | 911 -26% |
| Read 4k | 54.7 | 21.93 -60% | 32.93 -40% | 43.5 -20% | 57.5 5% |
| Write 4k | 139.4 | 30.94 -78% | 121.2 -13% | 159.7 15% | 140.2 1% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 518 | 339.5 -34% | 411 -21% | 570 10% | 497.1 -4% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 225.6 | 342.9 52% | 250.2 11% | 488.7 117% | 416 84% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1735 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 51912 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6054 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 940 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 434 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 34.2 / 35.8 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 35.8 / 39.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) | ||
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 1% | 0% | ||
| off / environment * | 28.7 | 30.2 -5% | 31.7 -10% | 30.4 -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 30.2 -5% | 31.7 -10% | 30.4 -6% | |
| Idle Average * | 34.2 | 30.2 12% | 31.7 7% | 30.4 11% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 35.8 | 30.2 16% | 31.7 11% | 30.4 15% | |
| Load Average * | 35.8 | 33 8% | 38.4 -7% | 40 -12% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.6 | 36.2 9% | 34.7 12% | 40 -1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.56 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.3 / 9.6 / 10.1 Watt |
| Carga |
34.4 / 34.8 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 42% | 17% | 15% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 2.1 60% | 3.1 42% | 4.3 19% | 3.6 32% | 5.5 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 9.6 | 7.6 21% | 4.3 55% | 6.3 34% | 6.4 33% | 6.7 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 8.2 19% | 4.9 51% | 9 11% | 9.2 9% | 7.1 30% |
| Load Average * | 34.4 | 56.4 -64% | 24.3 29% | 32.7 5% | 34 1% | 33.1 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.8 | 59.8 -72% | 22.8 34% | 28.8 17% | 34.4 1% | 35.2 -1% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -19% | 35% | 36% | -23% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 792 | 971 23% | 1069 35% | 718 -9% | 1233 56% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 537 | 566 5% | 686 28% | 644 20% | 394 -27% | 558 4% |
| Load | 114 | 66 -42% | 175 54% | 174 53% | 77 -32% | 121 6% |
Pro
Contra
HP ha mejorado su ya estupendo Spectre x360 13 incorporando una pantalla UHD 4k y soporte para stylus active para mejorar la experiencia tablet. Sigue siendo el ligero y manejable 2-en-1 que hizo que el modelo de 2016 destacara como uno de los convertibles más prácticos de su categoría.
Aparte de las actualizaciones ya mencionadas, sin embargo, estamos un poco decepcionados con HP por no haber podido mejorar la experiencia aún más. Por ejemplo, añadiendo un lector SD, software pare el control manual de los ventiladores y una retroiluminación más brillante que habrían diferenciado esta actualización de la versión de 2016. Es tentador usar el Spectre x360 en exteriores especialmente ahora que se incluye un active stylus, pero la iluminación de la pantalla no es tan buena como podría haber sido.
Tanto el XPS 13 9365 como el Yoga 910 estaban disponibles meses antes que nuestro análisis inicial del Spectre x360 13 de 2016 cada uno con sus ventajas e inconvenientes. El Dell es más ligero y pequeño sin sacrificar tamaño de pantalla, pero no tiene opción de panel 4K y la CPU con refrigeración pasiva es mucho más lenta. Por otro lado el Yoga 910 tiene una pantalla ligeramente más grande con configuración 4K y i7-7500U, pero carece de soporte para stylus y es más ancho y pesado que el HP. El nuevo Spectre x360 13 está en tierra de nadie entre rendimiento y portabilidad, combinando lo mejor de ambos mundos.
Esta temprana actualización finalmente proporciona pantalla 4K UHD y soporte para stylus en el ya admirado Spectre x360 de 2016. No ha cambiado mucho más, pero tampoco hacía falta - el convertible impresiona por su excelente equilibrio entre tamaño y rendimiento.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
- 04/05/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
