Breve análisis del convertible Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US (i5-7200U, FHD)
Top 10 Análisis
» Top 10 Portátiles Multimedia
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles Asequibles de Oficina/Empresa
» Top 10 Portátiles de Juego Ligeros
» Top 10 Portátiles de Oficina/Empresa Premium
» Top 10 Estaciones de Trabajo
» Top 10 Subportátiles
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets Windows
» Top 10 Tablets de menos de 250 Euros
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5")
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5")
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 300 Euros
» Top 10 Smartphones de menos de 120 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 1000 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 500 Euros
» Top 10 Portátiles de menos de 300 Euros
» Los Mejores Displays de Portátiles Analizados por Notebookcheck
|
iluminación: 83 %
Brillo con batería: 336.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1346:1 (Negro: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US B140HAN03.6, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, OLED, 14", 2560x1440 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 12.5", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 10% | 18% | 9% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 57.9 | 62.8 8% | 68.7 19% | 65.5 13% | |
sRGB Coverage | 84.4 | 94 11% | 96.8 15% | 88.8 5% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 58.9 | 64.7 10% | 70.4 20% | 64.9 10% | |
Response Times | 91% | 4% | -36% | -4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 3.6 ? 92% | 42.4 ? 7% | 67 ? -47% | 55.2 ? -21% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 3.2 ? 90% | 30.8 ? 1% | 39 ? -25% | 27.2 ? 13% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 210.1 ? | |||
Screen | 8% | 7% | -2% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 336.5 | 243 -28% | 523.2 55% | 442 31% | 262 -22% |
Brightness | 305 | 240 -21% | 522 71% | 410 34% | 256 -16% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 95 14% | 88 6% | 86 4% | 83 0% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.42 -68% | 0.22 12% | 0.25 -0% | |
Contrast | 1346 | 1246 -7% | 2009 49% | 1048 -22% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.3 -33% | 4 -0% | 5.22 -31% | 5.13 -28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 8.9 -37% | 8.6 -32% | 11.84 -82% | 9.46 -46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.7 -28% | 5.5 -90% | 7.88 -172% | 6.23 -115% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 1.78 124% | 2.16 102% | 2.51 88% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6487 100% | 6202 105% | 7546 86% | 6756 96% | 6413 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.4 | 84.8 127% | 64.86 73% | 64 71% | 57.84 55% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.8 | 100 70% | 93.97 60% | 97 65% | 88.57 51% |
Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 50% /
25% | 7% /
7% | -7% /
-2% | -3% /
-8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
---|---|---|
31.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida | |
↘ 13.2 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 83 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
45.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 22.4 ms subida | |
↘ 23.2 ms bajada | ||
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 76 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. |
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | |||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8706 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3817 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4599 puntos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4687 puntos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3311 puntos | |
ayuda |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 221% | 16% | -38% | -47% | |
Seq Read | 1493 | 2783 86% | 1328 -11% | 485.8 -67% | 486.9 -67% |
Seq Write | 286.2 | 1734 506% | 223.1 -22% | 243.6 -15% | 201.9 -29% |
4K Read | 31.96 | 56.4 76% | 27.6 -14% | 23.06 -28% | 27.37 -14% |
4K Write | 91.9 | 158.1 72% | 1.23 -99% | 76.7 -17% | 52.6 -43% |
4K-64 Read | 551 | 2140 288% | 1607 192% | 358 -35% | 286.2 -48% |
4K-64 Write | 340.4 | 1196 251% | 126.1 -63% | 160.9 -53% | 120.9 -64% |
Score Read | 732 | 2475 238% | 1768 142% | 430 -41% | 362 -51% |
Score Write | 461 | 1527 231% | 150 -67% | 262 -43% | 194 -58% |
Score Total | 1515 | 5215 244% | 2760 82% | 906 -40% | 736 -51% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10136 puntos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1732 puntos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49899 puntos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6530 puntos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 933 puntos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 374 puntos | |
ayuda |
bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61 | 33 | 27 | 8 |
Ruido
Ocioso |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 27.9 dB(A) |
Carga |
| 33.6 / 33.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 27.9 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | 1% | -4% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 27.9 | 29.3 -5% | 28.2 -1% | 30.4 -9% | 29 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.9 | 29.3 -5% | 28.2 -1% | 30.5 -9% | 29 -4% |
Idle Average * | 27.9 | 31.1 -11% | 28.2 -1% | 30.5 -9% | 29 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.9 | 33.3 -19% | 28.2 -1% | 30.5 -9% | 29 -4% |
Load Average * | 33.6 | 33.3 1% | 30.4 10% | 31.2 7% | 33.6 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 33.6 | 38.9 -16% | 34 -1% | 31.3 7% | 35.8 -7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1.2 °C / 2.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.4 / 7.4 / 7.6 Watt |
Carga |
31.3 / 34.4 Watt |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -28% | 8% | 25% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 4.9 -11% | 2.85 35% | 3.4 23% | 3.2 27% |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.6 -3% | 6.76 9% | 5.8 22% | 5.5 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 13.8 -82% | 6.91 9% | 6.7 12% | 6.5 14% |
Load Average * | 31.3 | 33.4 -7% | 32.88 -5% | 21.4 32% | 29.7 5% |
Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 46.5 -35% | 37.41 -9% | 21.6 37% | 41.3 -20% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duración de Batería | -17% | -1% | 18% | 54% | |
Reader / Idle | 753 | 784 4% | 1075 43% | 1001 33% | 1387 84% |
WiFi v1.3 | 647 | 368 -43% | 486 -25% | 719 11% | 630 -3% |
Load | 135 | 120 -11% | 105 -22% | 150 11% | 244 81% |
Pro
Contra
El ThinkPad X1 Yoga no es una máquina barata, sin importar la equipación, con precios por encima de $ 2.000 para la mayoría de las configuraciones (hoy: $ 2.267). Sin embargo, costando más de $ 1,500 menos que nuestro Core i7/OLED análisis, esta unidad probablemente parece mucho más alcanzable para el usuario medio de business. Y eso no es lo único que lo hace potencialmente más atractivo que su compañero WQHD: tampoco hay reducción de rendimiento sostenida por la CPU, es más silencioso, la duración de la batería es considerablemente más larga en la mayoría de los casos y las térmicas están mucho más en línea. Tampoco hay PWM en juego, a diferencia de lo que descubrimos en nuestra unidad de revisión OLED.
Realmente no hay mucho que esté mal con el ThinkPad X1 Yoga; Si una bisagra de 360 grados convertibles es lo que está buscando, realmente debería estar en su lista.
De hecho, aparte de la falta de resolución OLED y WQHD (esta es Full HD), de CPU ligeramente menos capaz y de SSD más lento, estas son prácticamente la misma máquina. Y debido a eso, no hay realmente tanto mal con el ThinkPad X1 Yoga: es una pieza de tecnología bien hecha, silenciosa, de fría ejecución, ágil, atractiva. Si buscas un convertible con una bisagra de 360 grados, realmente debería estar en su lista.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
- 07/29/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein