Breve análisis del portátil Acer Aspire F17 F5-771G (i5, GTX 950M)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 84 %
Brillo con batería: 339 cd/m²
Contraste: 969:1 (Negro: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus F756UX-T7013T Chi Mei CMN1735 / N173HGE-E11, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Medion Erazer P7644 AU Optronics B173HAN01.0, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -41% | 18% | -40% | -3% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 38.57 -45% | 84.2 21% | 38.65 -45% | 63.9 -8% | 63.4 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.2 | 57.4 -37% | 99.7 9% | 58 -36% | 93.7 3% | 90.3 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.8 | 39.89 -40% | 82.7 24% | 39.94 -40% | 64.6 -3% | 64.5 -3% |
| Response Times | -3% | -4% | -13% | 1% | -59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 39 ? 9% | 44 ? -2% | 44.8 ? -4% | 42 ? 2% | 48 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21 ? | 24 ? -14% | 23 ? -10% | 25.6 ? -22% | 21 ? -0% | 36 ? -71% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 1000 ? 0% | 1000 ? 0% | 50 ? -95% | ||
| Screen | -21% | -18% | 6% | 16% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 339 | 176 -48% | 234 -31% | 242 -29% | 268 -21% | 296 -13% |
| Brightness | 315 | 169 -46% | 219 -30% | 243 -23% | 255 -19% | 280 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 91 8% | 80 -5% | 75 -11% | 83 -1% | 87 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.47 -34% | 0.48 -37% | 0.24 31% | 0.17 51% | 0.48 -37% |
| Contrast | 969 | 374 -61% | 488 -50% | 1008 4% | 1576 63% | 617 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.4 | 8.83 15% | 11.8 -13% | 4.65 55% | 7.18 31% | 4.71 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.96 | 14.01 12% | 20.69 -30% | 9.64 40% | 11.67 27% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.67 | 8.97 23% | 13.3 -14% | 3.39 71% | 7.97 32% | 5.17 56% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.7 81% | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 13081 50% | 10234 64% | 17098 38% | 6246 104% | 8541 76% | 7613 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 36.8 -39% | 74 23% | 36.69 -39% | 59 -2% | 59 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 57.3 -37% | 100 10% | 57.66 -37% | 94 3% | 90 -1% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -22% /
-22% | -1% /
-8% | -16% /
-6% | 5% /
10% | -20% /
-12% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 16 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 5 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 43 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es similar al dispositivo testado medio (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 43 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 23 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 20 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 68 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 1000 Hz | ≤ 100 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1000 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 100 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 1000 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3372 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4205 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Asus F756UX-T7013T HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Medion Erazer P7644 Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -6% | 21% | 18525% | 17% | 12918% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.828 | 0.722 -13% | 0.884 7% | 319.2 38451% | 0.968 17% | 274.4 33040% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.666 | 0.647 -3% | 0.895 34% | 530 79480% | 0.812 22% | 305.7 45801% |
| Write 4k | 0.831 | 0.726 -13% | 0.9 8% | 123.4 14750% | 0.947 14% | 97.4 11621% |
| Read 4k | 0.331 | 0.366 11% | 0.413 25% | 34.3 10263% | 0.413 25% | 32.35 9673% |
| Write 512 | 27.34 | 25.93 -5% | 46.13 69% | 414 1414% | 39.12 43% | 389.1 1323% |
| Read 512 | 28.89 | 29.32 1% | 35.32 22% | 759 2527% | 33.33 15% | 384.5 1231% |
| Write Seq | 103.1 | 85.6 -17% | 105.6 2% | 468.1 354% | 105 2% | 393.3 281% |
| Read Seq | 107.1 | 95.3 -11% | 108.1 1% | 1140 964% | 105.8 -1% | 511 377% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4228 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10334 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3218 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Asus F756UX-T7013T | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Dirt Rally | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| 1024x768 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Medion Erazer P7644 | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dirt Rally (2015) | 137.2 | 77.7 | 40.05 | 25.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 55.7 | 36.1 | 16.2 | 10.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 71.4 | 40.98 | 23.08 | 20.33 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 31.5 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 31.6 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 34.4 / dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 31.7 / 34.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Asus F756UX-T7013T GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | Medion Erazer P7644 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -7% | 1% | -13% | -12% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.9 4% | 31.2 -4% | 29 3% | 31.2 -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 30.8 2% | 32.4 -3% | 29 8% | 32.4 -3% | 33.4 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 31.5 | 30.8 2% | 33.5 -6% | 29 8% | 32.6 -3% | 33.4 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 30.8 3% | 33.5 -6% | 29 8% | 32.6 -3% | 33.4 -6% |
| Load Average * | 31.7 | 33.4 -5% | 35.2 -11% | 34.3 -8% | 42 -32% | 39.7 -25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 31.4 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 40.1 -16% | 38.7 -12% | 40.1 -16% | 45.2 -31% | 40.1 -16% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.5 °C / 99.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.22 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.9 / 13.6 / 14.8 Watt |
| Carga |
41 / 75 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Medion Erazer P7644 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 256GB PC3110-S10C, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -9% | 29% | 2% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 6 13% | 8.3 -20% | 2.8 59% | 5.8 16% | 8.9 -29% |
| Idle Average * | 13.6 | 8.1 40% | 12.1 11% | 6.3 54% | 11.2 18% | 13.3 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.8 | 9.8 34% | 15.4 -4% | 6.9 53% | 11.9 20% | 14.1 5% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 52.5 -28% | 56 -37% | 51.6 -26% | 54 -32% | 60 -46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 75 | 81.6 -9% | 70 7% | 69.7 7% | 84 -12% | 83 -11% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 38 Wh | Medion Erazer P7644 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 44% | 58% | 75% | -6% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 429 | 767 79% | 667 55% | 883 106% | 491 14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 268 | 451 68% | 386 44% | 462 72% | 217 -19% | 287 7% |
| Load | 87 | 75 -14% | 152 75% | 129 48% | 75 -14% | |
| H.264 | 460 | 335 |
Pro
Contra
The Acer Aspire F17 F5-771G is an affordable, well-made all-round device that can be purchased for around 699 Euros ($800). However, the base model lacks fast SSD storage and an operating system, which will not matter to those who already own a Windows license. The shortcomings include a slight screen bleeding, a small battery, and tiny keyboard keys. Overall, the positive aspects outbalance the negative.
El Acer Aspire F17 F5-771G es un dispositivo asequible, bien hecho y todo terreno que se puede obtener por unos 699€ ($800). Sin embargo, el modelo base carece de un almacenamiento rápido SSD y de sistema operativo, cosa que no importará a quienes ya cuenten con una licencia de Windows. Los defectos incluyen un leve sangrado de la pantalla, una batería pequeña y un teclado de teclas enanas. En general, los aspectos positivos superan los negativos.
In particular, we liked how quiet the device remained under load. Even though it did not perform worse than its competition, it remained significantly quieter, which is particularly advantageous when playing games. On the downside, the fans are never off even when idle, and the GPU throttles under load. The aluminum lid and keyboard shell are a big plus, and are absent from most devices in the Aspire’s price range. Upgradability of hard drive and RAM is also very easy, access to the battery and the fans, on the other hand is not.
En particular, nos gustó lo silencioso que se mantuvo el dispositivo bajo carga. Aunque no rindió peor que su competencia, se mantuvo mucho más silencioso, una gran ventaja a la hora de jugar. La parte mala, los ventiladores no se apagan aunque esté inactivo, y se produce cuello de botella en la GPU bajo carga. La tapa y cubierta de aluminio son un gran plus, y no están presentes en la mayoría de los dispositivos del rango de precios del Aspire. Es muy fácil mejorar el disco duro, al contrario que el acceso a la batería y los ventiladores.
Acer’s affordable and well-made 17-inch all-round notebook remains surprisingly quiet under load.
El portátil de 17" de Acer asequible y todo terreno se mantiene asombrosamente silencioso bajo carga.
With its decent all-round hardware, the large notebook is best suited for home users, casual gamers, and non-professional video editing. While its versatility is superb, its mobility is limited by its size, its weight, and its below average battery life.
Con su decente hardware todo terreno, el gran portátil es más adecuado para usuarios domésticos, jugadores casuales, y edición de vídeo no profesional. Aunque su versatilidad es genial, su movilidad está limitada por su tamaño, su peso, y el aguante de su batería por debajo de la media.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD
- 05/18/2017 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze
Price comparison
