Breve análisis del portátil Asus ROG Strix GL553VD (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1050)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 (jseb) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 (jseb) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 93 %
Brillo con batería: 289.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 998:1 (Negro: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 BOE HF NV156FHM-N43, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -43% | 21% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.6 | 36.42 -46% | 85.4 26% | 59.9 -11% 40.34 -40% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.8 | 54.9 -40% | 100 10% | 85.9 -5% 60.3 -34% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.4 | 37.62 -43% | 83.8 26% | 61.6 -7% 41.73 -37% |
| Response Times | 20% | 23% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 57.6 ? | 36 ? 37% | 44 ? 24% | 55 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 36 ? 3% | 29 ? 22% | 31 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | |||
| Screen | -123% | -91% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 289.3 | 246 -15% | 258 -11% | 214 -26% |
| Brightness | 280 | 235 -16% | 234 -16% | 203 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 75 -19% | 79 -15% | 79 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.55 -90% | 0.54 -86% | 0.28 3% |
| Contrast | 998 | 447 -55% | 478 -52% | 764 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 10.97 -254% | 9.74 -214% | 6.04 -95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 14.6 -106% | 12 -69% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 14.25 -579% | 11.59 -452% | 5.91 -181% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 1.83 120% | 2.19 100% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6226 104% | 11200 58% | 11851 55% | 7362 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 35 -41% | 76 29% | 38 -36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 55 -40% | 100 10% | 60 -34% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -49% /
-86% | -16% /
-54% | -20% /
-34% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 4.8 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 32.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 95 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 57.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 23.6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 34 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 93 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3567 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3770 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4317 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4680 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 8181% | 10% | 7113% | 9543% | |
| Read Seq | 93.5 | 485.8 420% | 112.4 20% | 475.7 409% | 494.2 429% |
| Write Seq | 89.6 | 422.8 372% | 107.3 20% | 169.2 89% | 449.6 402% |
| Read 512 | 39.06 | 338.9 768% | 43.19 11% | 327.6 739% | 348.1 791% |
| Write 512 | 51.1 | 304 495% | 57 12% | 169.6 232% | 418.2 718% |
| Read 4k | 0.57 | 27.11 4656% | 0.494 -13% | 33.14 5714% | 16.97 2877% |
| Write 4k | 1.05 | 85.4 8033% | 1.122 7% | 81.4 7652% | 38.36 3553% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.06 | 279.6 26277% | 1.088 3% | 276.8 26013% | 394.9 37155% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.04 | 255.1 24429% | 1.234 19% | 168 16054% | 317.4 30419% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7423 puntos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65973 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18436 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5455 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2693 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Doom | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Thief | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Fallout 4 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (ordenar por valor) | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 128 | 62 | ||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 64 | 41 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 61 | 42 | ||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 39 | 34 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 36 | 30 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 32 | 28 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 58 | 54 | ||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 26 | 24 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 33.4 / 33.4 / 33.4 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 46.5 / 49.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | 1% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 30.6 | 30.3 1% | 30.6 -0% | 30 2% | 30.8 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.4 | 30.9 7% | 32.5 3% | 32 4% | 35.3 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 33.4 | 30.9 7% | 32.5 3% | 33 1% | 35.4 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 31 7% | 32.5 3% | 36 -8% | 35.4 -6% |
| Load Average * | 46.5 | 46.5 -0% | 36.4 22% | 43 8% | 48.6 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.6 | 46.8 6% | 52.4 -6% | 49 1% | 49.8 -0% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.7 / 11.7 / 12 Watt |
| Carga |
80.5 / 128.4 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | -21% | -7% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.7 | 4.4 43% | 10.6 -38% | 7 9% | 8.2 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 11.7 | 6.8 42% | 14.5 -24% | 11 6% | 11 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12 | 8.3 31% | 15 -25% | 19 -58% | 11.1 7% |
| Load Average * | 80.5 | 81 -1% | 90 -12% | 79 2% | 77 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 128.4 | 127 1% | 135 -5% | 119 7% | 116.9 9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 74 Wh | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 121% | -14% | 34% | 32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 440 | 1174 167% | 387 -12% | 467 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 276 | 622 125% | 225 -18% | 272 -1% | 365 32% |
| Load | 47 | 81 72% | 41 -13% | 93 98% |
Pro
Contra
El Asus GL553VD es un principe entre los mendigos. Mientras que su tarjeta gráfica está orientada al consumidor preocupado por el precio, su precio no lo está. Encontramos el mismo hardware en el MSI GL62M por 100 o 150 euros menos. Este precio es aún menor si los usuarios aceptan cambiar el Core i7-770HQ por un Core i5-7300HQ más modesto. Por otra parte, los usuarios encuentran en el Dell Inspiron 15 7000 la más potente GTX 1050 Ti al mismo precio o el Acer Aspire VX5 por 50 euros menos.
¿Que obtienes a cambio de pagar más? El Asus GL553 incluye un teclado increible con iluminación RGB, buen diseño para disipar el calor y una gran pantalla UPS. La calidad de construcción es de primera clase; el portátil aparenta y se siente fantástico. Pero los usuarios tienen que decidir estas características merecen la pena los 100-200 euros adicionales.
Para jugones que busquen jugar a tope de detalle en resolución HD, la elección nunca ha estado más complicada. El Asus GL553 proporciona una solida experiencia con juegos en un paquete bonito y bien construido. Los usuarios que quieran una pantalla, teclado y un acabado de calidad quedarán satisfechos con el Asus GL553. Sin embargo aquellos que solo se preocupen de los juegos independientemente de la máquina en la que se jueguen, encontrarán disponibles opciones mucho mejores (y más baratas)
El HP Omen 15 sigue siendo una buena opción; a pesar del hardware de la generación anterior, el rendimiento es parecido. Los clientes potenciales pueden mirar el mercado de segunda mano para obtener grandes descuentos. El Dell Inspiron 15 7000 tiene mejor GPU y disco SSD por un precio similar y habría que tenerlo en cuenta. Y por apenas unos pocos cientos de euros más se puede acceder a dispositivos con la Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060, que ofrece un rendimiento fantástico con juegos con resoluciones FullHD o superiores.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
- 03/12/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
