Breve análisis del portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus (Core i7)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1143:1 (Negro: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -26% | -18% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 64.6 -1% | 44.45 -32% | 48.94 -25% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.9 | 89.1 7% | 65.2 -21% | 73.3 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.6 | 64.8 7% | 45.96 -24% | 50.5 -17% |
| Response Times | 19% | 23% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 31 ? 31% | 32 ? 29% | 32.8 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 27 ? 7% | 24 ? 17% | 33.2 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 3% | -9% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 343 | 359 5% | 289 -16% | 351.2 2% |
| Brightness | 306 | 344 12% | 298 -3% | 325 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 92 14% | 87 7% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.25 17% | 0.27 10% | 0.195 35% |
| Contrast | 1143 | 1436 26% | 1070 -6% | 1801 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.73 | 4.57 3% | 4.82 -2% | 7.4 -56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.05 | 9.25 -2% | 10.73 -19% | 9.08 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.29 | 5.2 -58% | 3.84 -17% | 6.71 -104% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.74 80% |
| CCT | 6437 101% | 6887 94% | 6492 100% | 7222 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 58 7% | 42.03 -22% | 50.48 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 89 7% | 64.8 -22% | 73.31 -12% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 9% /
5% | -4% /
-8% | -6% /
-7% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 6 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 23 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 45 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 12 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 33 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 75 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3147 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4184 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -48% | -6% | -27% | |
| Read Seq | 1577 | 431.2 -73% | 1482 -6% | 1233 -22% |
| Write Seq | 1472 | 401 -73% | 1232 -16% | 733 -50% |
| Read 512 | 1165 | 283.7 -76% | 1191 2% | 1036 -11% |
| Write 512 | 1244 | 313.6 -75% | 1220 -2% | 439.9 -65% |
| Read 4k | 54.8 | 36.62 -33% | 46.96 -14% | 29.31 -47% |
| Write 4k | 121.5 | 76.1 -37% | 100.7 -17% | 116.9 -4% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 407.5 | 329.4 -19% | 464 14% | 479.2 18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 321.4 | 325.6 1% | 292.1 -9% | 218.3 -32% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2589 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7123 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1794 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38.6 | 22.4 | ||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 36 | 16 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 94.1 | 40 | 26.8 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 36.2 / 37.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 7.4 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
43 / 42 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 20% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.1 -14% | 4.3 -19% | 4.1 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 6.4 14% | 6 19% | 4.2 43% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 6.8 22% | 6.4 26% | 5.1 41% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 16 63% | 22.7 47% | 22.1 49% |
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 18.7 55% | 31.2 26% | 29.4 30% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 68% | 29% | 118% | |
| Reader / Idle | 468 | 792 69% | 526 12% | 1295 177% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 338 | 438 30% | 355 5% | 677 100% |
| Load | 89 | 182 104% | 152 71% | 157 76% |
| H.264 | 410 | 413 |
Pro
Contra
Al contrario que nos ocurrió con su predecesor, hemos descubierto algunos pequeños fallos de fabricación en el nuevo Ideapad 710S Plus de Lenovo. Sin embargo lo único que tiene importancia es el touchpad, que no es totalmente liso. La estupenda pantalla habría sido aún mejor con una superficie mate y una mayor cobertura de color. Incluso a pesar de que en el mundo de los subportátiles está bien vista la ausencia de muchas interfaces no habría estado mal un puerto de salida de video dedicado, como HDMI o un DP. La duración de batería no es la adecuada para definirlo como un dispositivo para movilidad. El único inconveniente que podría poner en peligro la recomendación de compra es el molesto ruido ocasional del ventilador, aunque hay que tener en cuenta que no debería suponer problema la mayor parte del tiempo y de que podría tratarse de un fallo puntual de nuestro modelo de prueba.
Movilidad y versatilidad son las propiedades más importantes del muy convincente Lenovo Ideapad 710S Plus. Sin embargo los potenciales compradores deberían tener en cuenta el problema con el ventilador.
Por supuesto, la ligera y rígida carcasa debe ser mencionada como punto a favor. Los dispositivos de entrada son adecuados para la mayoría de los usuarios. TPM y el lector de huellas son adecuados para usuarios preocupados por la seguridad y la ligera reducción de velocidad de la GeForce 940MS con memoria GDDR5 resultará adecuada para los jugadores casuales. En contraste con su predecesor, no se usa PWM, el SSD es muy rápido y no se pueden poner peros al rendimiento WiFi. En resumen, no quiero negarle al nuevo 710S la recomendación de compra pero si recomendaríamos que lo oigas en funcionamiento. Los usuarios que no quieran jugar posiblemente harían mejor en comprar la versión más barata equipada con un i5-7200U.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
- 02/01/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
