Breve análisis del Smartphone ElePhone S7
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 95 %
Brillo con batería: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 954:1 (Negro: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
| Elephone S7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Vernee Mars IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -2% | 15% | 29% | 30% | -14% | 55% | |
| Brightness middle | 391 | 409 5% | 515 32% | 418 7% | 345 -12% | 552 41% | 554 42% |
| Brightness | 379 | 411 8% | 498 31% | 410 8% | 339 -11% | 526 39% | 552 46% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 96 1% | 93 -2% | 85 -11% | 85 -11% | 91 -4% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.38 7% | 0.49 -20% | 0.31 24% | 0.14 66% | 0.64 -56% | |
| Contrast | 954 | 1076 13% | 1051 10% | 1348 41% | 2464 158% | 863 -10% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.2 | 9.4 -15% | 6.2 24% | 4.4 46% | 7.1 13% | 11 -34% | 1.59 81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.7 | 17.6 -20% | 11.4 22% | 6.5 56% | 13.9 5% | 20.8 -41% | 2.56 83% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.8 | 11.6 -18% | 7.4 24% | 3.6 63% | 6.7 32% | 14.3 -46% | 2.01 79% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 10108 64% | 9597 68% | 8664 75% | 6993 93% | 7711 84% | 12996 50% | 6321 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.12 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.98 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8715 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 7 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 17 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 48 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 47 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 10 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 37 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 79 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (ordenar por valor) | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Honor 5C | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Elephone S7 | |
| Honor 5C | |
| Vernee Mars | |
| UMI Super Euro Edition | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| ZTE Blade V7 | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Elephone S7 Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Blade V7 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash | UMI Super Euro Edition Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Vernee Mars Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | 56% | 14% | 21% | -5% | 136% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 18.57 | 20.89 12% | 24.21 30% | 17.88 -4% | 24 29% | 11.87 -36% | 50.4 171% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 32.86 | 43.67 33% | 51.9 58% | 36.22 10% | 44.5 35% | 15.56 -53% | 76.4 133% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.89 | 7.58 -4% | 15.7 99% | 11.88 51% | 15.77 100% | 11.4 44% | 15.79 100% |
| Random Read 4KB | 21.8 | 28.07 29% | 61.7 183% | 28.17 29% | 21.66 -1% | 28.02 29% | 86.7 298% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 167.1 | 39.45 -76% | 75.5 -55% | 126.9 -24% | 71.6 -57% | 122.7 -27% | 145.1 -13% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 213.8 | 196.8 -8% | 263 23% | 257.8 21% | 255.9 20% | 247.6 16% | 487.3 128% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 34 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configuraciones | Valor | ||
| high | 27 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Elephone S7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.18 / 0.37 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.42 / 1.87 / 2.11 Watt |
| Carga |
6.16 / 10.67 Watt |
    
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Elephone S7 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 45% | 24% | 14% | 23% | -29% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.42 | 0.73 49% | 0.89 37% | 0.84 41% | 1.02 28% | 1.83 -29% | 0.63 56% |
| Idle Average * | 1.87 | 0.92 51% | 2.07 -11% | 1.94 -4% | 1.69 10% | 3.21 -72% | 1.1 41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.11 | 0.93 56% | 2.15 -2% | 2.07 2% | 1.82 14% | 3.45 -64% | 1.56 26% |
| Load Average * | 6.16 | 4.47 27% | 3.46 44% | 5.88 5% | 4.39 29% | 5.67 8% | 5.95 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.67 | 5.96 44% | 5.18 51% | 7.67 28% | 6.79 36% | 9.16 14% | 6.7 37% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Elephone S7 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 133% | 85% | 173% | 91% | 85% | 195% | |
| Reader / Idle | 483 | 997 106% | 1254 160% | 1663 244% | |||
| H.264 | 334 | 602 80% | 914 174% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 223 | 519 133% | 584 162% | 638 186% | 427 91% | 412 85% | 732 228% |
| Load | 168 | 156 -7% | 392 133% |
Pro
Contra
Si tuvieramos que resumir el elePhone S7 en una frase, nuestro veredicto exagerado sería: bonito a la vista, pero sin mucha sustancia.
El aspecto y la construcción de la carcasa son muy buenos para su nivel de precios. El panel IPS es bastante nítido y suficientemente brillante en el uso diario. También nos gustó bastante la calidad de llamaday el lector de huellas de buen funcionamiento.
El poco aguante de batería, causado por la ineficiente gestión de energía por un lado, y el altísimo brillo mínimo de la pantalla por la otra, no dicen nada a favor del smartphone elePhone. Lo que es más, el rendimiento no está al nivel de sus rivales directos a pesar del alto rendimiento de los SoCs MediaTek. Otros puntos de crítica, tales como la RAM lenta, la mediocre calidad de cámara y altavoz, y las bajas tasas de transmisión del módulo WiFi, no resultan en un concepto totalmente redondo. El Honor 5C o el Vernee Mars (ambos disponibles en Alemania a través de compañías de importación) son, a nuestro parecer, mejores alternativas.
Hace falta el original para tener una experiencia Galaxy S7 - al m enos el elePhone S7 no es realmente una alternativa. El smartphone de gama media tampoco nos terminó de convencer en la comparación con la competición directa.
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Elephone S7
- 12/22/2016 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
