Breve análisis del portátil Dell XPS 13 9360R (i5-8250U, QHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 72 %
Brillo con batería: 342 cd/m²
Contraste: 1094:1 (Negro: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.63
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris SHP1449, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -1% | 32% | 3% | -2% | 4% | -18% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.9 | 63.6 0% | 64.6 1% | 99.2 55% | 65.8 3% | 66.8 5% | 66.8 5% | 51.6 -19% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.7 | 93 1% | 88.8 -3% | 99.9 9% | 96.2 5% | 86.3 -6% | 95.4 4% | 77.4 -16% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 65.4 0% | 64.8 -1% | 87.1 33% | 66.8 2% | 63.1 -4% | 68 4% | 53.3 -19% |
| Response Times | -4% | -35% | -22% | 3% | -56% | -22% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 35.6 ? -23% | 46 ? -59% | 42.8 ? -48% | 33 ? -14% | 48 ? -66% | 41.2 ? -42% | 41.2 ? -42% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 27.2 ? 9% | 33 ? -10% | 28.8 ? 4% | 24 ? 20% | 32 ? -7% | 30.4 ? -1% | 30 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 19500 ? | 19690 ? 1% | 1000 ? -95% | 19530 ? 0% | ||||
| Screen | 7% | 2% | 39% | 23% | -1% | 17% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 361 | 386.1 7% | 404 12% | 588 63% | 408 13% | 281 -22% | 387 7% | 461 28% |
| Brightness | 303 | 357 18% | 382 26% | 561 85% | 395 30% | 264 -13% | 358 18% | 418 38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 72 | 83 15% | 91 26% | 92 28% | 88 22% | 83 15% | 88 22% | 85 18% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.33 -0% | 0.35 -6% | 0.45 -36% | 0.45 -36% | 0.23 30% | 0.47 -42% | 0.2 39% |
| Contrast | 1094 | 1170 7% | 1154 5% | 1307 19% | 907 -17% | 1222 12% | 823 -25% | 2305 111% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.26 | 4.2 20% | 5.37 -2% | 1.7 68% | 1.55 71% | 4.83 8% | 1.6 70% | 5.4 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.79 | 7.6 2% | 9.46 -21% | 3.5 55% | 2.19 72% | 8.89 -14% | 4 49% | 12.2 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.69 | 5.7 -0% | 6.44 -13% | 1.9 67% | 1.91 66% | 6.63 -17% | 1 82% | 5.4 5% |
| Gamma | 1.63 135% | 2.28 96% | 2.52 87% | 2.33 94% | 2.34 94% | 1.85 119% | 2.26 97% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6499 100% | 7336 89% | 6738 96% | 6738 96% | 6491 100% | 6794 96% | 6680 97% | 7258 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 59 0% | 58 -2% | 77.92 32% | 61 3% | 56 -5% | 61.6 4% | 48.6 -18% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 92.2 0% | 89 -3% | 99.94 9% | 96 4% | 86 -7% | 82.2 -11% | 76.9 -16% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 1% /
4% | -11% /
-3% | 16% /
30% | 10% /
16% | -20% /
-12% | -0% /
10% | -6% /
3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 18 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 12 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 78 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 29 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 19 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 10 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 35 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado | 19500 Hz | ≤ 100 % de brillo |  |
La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 19500 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 100 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM. La frecuencia de 19500 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual. Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8743 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3186 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4501 puntos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4092 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell XPS 13-9350 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13 9343 Core i7 Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | Dell XPS 13-9343 Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 2% | 92% | -1% | 54% | 2% | 29% | -17% | -1% | |
| Read Seq | 1046 | 741 -29% | 1090 4% | 1019 -3% | 1314 26% | 1097 5% | 1168 12% | 527 -50% | 489.6 -53% |
| Write Seq | 337.4 | 461.2 37% | 1088 222% | 195.4 -42% | 617 83% | 307.7 -9% | 329 -2% | 237.2 -30% | 424.2 26% |
| Read 512 | 443.9 | 504 14% | 753 70% | 735 66% | 1058 138% | 684 54% | 1015 129% | 420.5 -5% | 371.9 -16% |
| Write 512 | 265.7 | 310.3 17% | 911 243% | 172.3 -35% | 502 89% | 308.6 16% | 307 16% | 241.6 -9% | 395.5 49% |
| Read 4k | 26.67 | 29.48 11% | 57.5 116% | 34.5 29% | 37.31 40% | 38.52 44% | 33 24% | 28.29 6% | 34.76 30% |
| Write 4k | 115.6 | 68.1 -41% | 140.2 21% | 109.4 -5% | 133.6 16% | 113 -2% | 132 14% | 103.7 -10% | 79.3 -31% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 365.5 | 498.9 36% | 497.1 36% | 494.6 35% | 425.1 16% | 244.7 -33% | 525 44% | 352.4 -4% | 354 -3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 345.8 | 257.5 -26% | 416 20% | 161.3 -53% | 431.3 25% | 151.5 -56% | 325 -6% | 239 -31% | 326.3 -6% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1856 puntos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8773 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Farming Simulator 17 - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 71 | 35 | 31 | 9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.4 | 14 | 6.8 | |
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 19 | 8 |
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 38.3 / 33.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions | ||||||
| Fan Noise | 38.3 | 34.9 -9% | 38.5 1% | 39.3 3% | 40 4% | |
| Noise | 2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 29.9 2% | 30.3 -0% | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 29.9 2% | 30.6 -1% | 30.2 1% | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 30.4 | 29.9 2% | 30.6 -1% | 30.3 -0% | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 30.3 -0% | 32.2 -6% | 30.4 -0% | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% |
| Load Average * | 38.3 | 33.9 11% | 32.2 16% | 34.4 10% | 32.9 14% | 40 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.6 | 34.9 -4% | 38.5 -15% | 48 -43% | 39.3 -17% | 40 -19% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -4% /
1% | 0% /
-1% | -6% /
-6% | 2% /
1% | 0% /
-3% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7560U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell XPS 13-9343 HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions | ||||||
| Fan Noise | 38.3 | 34.9 -9% | 38.5 1% | 39.3 3% | 40 4% | |
| Heat | -15% | -11% | -8% | -3% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.3 | 46.2 -12% | 40.6 2% | 40 3% | 43.5 -5% | 54.2 -31% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.5 | 48.8 -5% | 41.2 11% | 42 10% | 40.6 13% | 37.7 19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.1 | 28.3 -17% | 31.2 -29% | 28 -16% | 27 -12% | 29 -20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 23.9 | 29.7 -24% | 30.6 -28% | 31 -30% | 26.1 -9% | 27.6 -15% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | -12% /
-13% | -11% /
-11% | -4% /
-6% | 0% /
-2% | -4% /
-9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.29 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 7.9 / 8.5 Watt |
| Carga |
43 / 43 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris i7-7560U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | 17% | 4% | -2% | -16% | 6% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.1 -14% | 3.32 8% | 3.6 -0% | 5.6 -56% | 4.6 -28% | 3.7 -3% | 3.6 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 5.8 27% | 5.27 33% | 9.5 -20% | 7.5 5% | 11 -39% | 5.2 34% | 6.4 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.5 | 6 29% | 6.32 26% | 9.5 -12% | 8.4 1% | 12 -41% | 7.6 11% | 9.2 -8% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 42.5 1% | 32 26% | 32.9 23% | 33.7 22% | 39.5 8% | 41.6 3% | 34 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 43 | 41.4 4% | 45.9 -7% | 31.4 27% | 34.6 20% | 34.6 20% | 50.5 -17% | 34.4 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 30 | 31 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris i7-7560U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9343 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 52 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | -5% | 13% | -10% | -24% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1092 | 1108 1% | 1521 39% | 912 -16% | 718 -34% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 689 | 589 -15% | 655 -5% | 681 -1% | 394 -43% | |
| Load | 146 | 143 -2% | 154 5% | 140 -4% | 78 -47% | 77 -47% |
| H.264 | 899 | 683 | 367 | |||
| WiFi | 580 |
Pro
Contra
El Dell XPS 13 sigue siendo un subportátil excelente y, como tal, definitivamente merece las repetidas apariciones en nuestra lista de las 10 principales. Un aguante de 11.5 horas, una pantalla con 90% de cobertura sRGB y un brillo decente, un robusto chasis de aluminio, un sistema silencioso de ventiladores, sonido decente dado el tamaño, muchos puertos y facilidad de mantenimiento. Todos estos atributos hacen que el portátil de 13" sea muy deseable.
La pregunta principal que nos hicimos al principio de este análisis: ¿es adecuada la CPU Kaby Lake R i5 o la actualización a i7 vale la pena el dinero?
En nuestra opinión, el SoC de gama baja es más que suficiente para la mayoría de los usuarios, a menos que la intención sea ejecutar principalmente aplicaciones en paralelo. Tanto los procesadores i5 como i7 aceleran su velocidad cuando están sujetos a cargas prolongadas y el rendimiento disminuye en un 8 y 9%, respectivamente. En ningún momento, durante nuestras pruebas, los núcleos alcanzaron sus respectivas velocidades máximas teóricas de Turbo de 3.4 y 4.0 GHz. La diferencia de rendimiento de la CPU entre las versiones i5 e i7 del XPS 13 es muy pequeña y oscila entre el +19% en su mejor versión y el +7% en el peor de los casos (pruebas entre únicos frente a múltiples subprocesos). El i7 se adelanta un poco cuando se trata del rendimiento del sistema (+ 8%).
Ambas versiones de XPS 13 superan a otros portatiles como HP Envy 13-ad006ng o Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 por la solidez de sus CPU, Kaby Lake R con 8 subprocesos. El i7, por ejemplo, tiene un rendimiento superior al 70% (R15 Multi, Kaby i7 frente a Kaby R i7). El nuevo quad-core i5 es hasta un 75% más rápido que el anterior dual-core 7200U (R15 Multi).
Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Price comparison
