Deutsch
English
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarAnálisis del portátil Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24) - Un buen todoterreno con un Ryzen 8000 y hasta 96 GB de RAM
El nuevo XMG Evo 14 de Schenker es un portátil compacto de 14 pulgadas que pretende destacar por su gran variedad de conexiones, así como por sus buenas opciones de mantenimiento. Como usuario, puede elegir entre un AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (desde unos 1.060 dólares) o un Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (desde unos 1.223 dólares) junto con sus correspondientes iGPU. Nuestro dispositivo de prueba es la variante AMD con 32 GB de RAM, una unidad SSD de 1 TB y Windows preinstalado, que puede adquirirse por unos 1.335 dólares. Además, Schenker ha publicado una profundización extremadamente detallada en https://www.xmg.gg/en/news-deep-dive-xmg-evo-m24/ con toda la información sobre el Evo 14 y el Evo 15.
Como alternativa, Tuxedo ofrece el InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9, que son equipos de idéntica construcción con Linux. El modelo AMD https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/TUXEDO-InfinityBook-Pro-14-Gen9-AMD.tuxedo puede adquirirse desde unos 1.345 dólares, mientras que la variante Intel https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/TUXEDO-InfinityBook-Pro-14-Gen9-INTEL.tuxedo cuesta unos 1.470 dólares.
Posibles contendientes en la comparación
Valoración | Version | Fecha | Modelo | Peso | Altura | Tamaño | Resolución | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
| 85.3 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Tenga en cuenta que: recientemente hemos actualizado nuestro sistema de clasificación y los resultados de la versión 8 no son comparables con los de la versión 7. Encontrará más información aquí.
Estuche y conectividad
Al igual que con el XMG Evo 15el fabricante ha optado por utilizar una robusta carcasa de aluminio, salvo que la Evo 14 no es negra, sino gris oscuro. Por tanto, es mucho menos sensible a la acumulación de marcas de huellas dactilares. Su estabilidad general es muy buena y las bisagras también están bien ajustadas, por lo que el balanceo al ajustar el ángulo de la tapa es mínimo. Su ángulo máximo de apertura es de casi 180 grados.
En comparación con la mayoría de los portátiles actuales de 14 pulgadas, el Evo 14 cuenta con un gran número de conexiones, incluyendo Gigabit Ethernet y un lector de tarjetas completo. Sin embargo, es un misterio para nosotros por qué uno de los tres puertos USB-A normales sólo admite el antiguo estándar 2.0. Sus opciones de mantenimiento también son estupendas, ya que dispone de dos ranuras para RAM (máximo 96 GB) y dos ranuras para SSD M.2 2280. No obstante, la carcasa sigue siendo bastante compacta en general y con un peso de 1,46 kg, tampoco es demasiado pesada.
El módulo WLAN (Intel AX210) ofrece velocidades de transferencia muy buenas y estables, pero aún no es compatible con Wi-Fi 7. La cámara web -que es compatible con Studio Effects de Microsoft- toma fotos decentes y, gracias a su sensor de infrarrojos, el reconocimiento facial a través de Windows Hello también está a bordo. Al lector de tarjetas completo no pareció gustarle mucho nuestra tarjeta de referencia (máx. 90 MB/s); consiguió más de 250 MB/s utilizando otra tarjeta (ADATA V90). Esto significa que puede esperar diferencias bastante significativas dependiendo de la tarjeta que utilice.
El teclado negro retroiluminado ofrece un buen contraste con la carcasa gris y la sensación al escribir es media, pero sus teclas más grandes emiten un ruido bastante fuerte. El clickpad de cristal (12,3 x 7,7 cm) funciona bien en general, pero le recomendaríamos que sólo golpeara el pad para las entradas. Los clics mecánicos emiten un ruido fuerte, que no se siente particularmente de alta calidad.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Pantalla - IPS con 400 nits y 100 % sRGB
La pantalla IPS de 14 pulgadas del Evo 14 muestra una imagen muy nítida gracias a sus 2.880 x 1.800 píxeles en una relación de aspecto 16:10. Su superficie mate ayuda a evitar los reflejos, pero la imagen afortunadamente no parece granulada. Los colores son vivos, pero no comparables a los de los paneles OLED. A su vez, no se utiliza PWM y su frecuencia de refresco de 120 Hz garantiza la suavidad de los movimientos. Su brillo es de más de 400 cd/m² y, junto con su decente nivel de negro, da como resultado una relación de contraste máxima de más de 1.300:1. Sin embargo, ni el brillo ni la temperatura del color pueden ajustarse automáticamente.
Se puede descargar un perfil precalibrado desde el Centro de Control, que causó muy buena impresión durante nuestra prueba. En nuestro análisis con el software profesional CalMAN, sus desviaciones de color y escala de grises ya estaban por debajo del importante límite de 3. Podríamos mejorar la pantalla aún más con nuestra propia calibración (disponible para descargar gratuitamente en el cuadro de la derecha), pero no es estrictamente necesario. Junto con su completa cobertura sRGB, el panel es adecuado para editar imágenes sin restricciones.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminación: 90 %
Brillo con batería: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1316:1 (Negro: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
| Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
| Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
| Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
| Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
| Media total (Programa/Opciones) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Tiempos de respuesta del display
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.4 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 5.3 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 8.1 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró buenos tiempos de respuesta en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones competitivos. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 31 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (21 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
| ↔ Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris | ||
| 26.3 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada | ↗ 11.9 ms subida |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms bajada | ||
| La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta relativamente lentos en nuestros tests pero podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones. En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 32 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores. Esto quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta medido es mejor que la media (32.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados. | ||
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM no detectado |  | ||
Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8746 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz. | |||
Rendimiento - Ryzen 7 8845HS y hasta 96 GB de RAM
El XMG Evo 14 tiene tres perfiles de rendimiento para elegir(Equilibrado, Enthusiast, Overboost) y hemos resumido los datos en la siguiente tabla. Para nuestros benchmarks y mediciones se utilizó el modo Enthusiast por defecto.
| Perfil energético | CPU TDP | CPU TDP batería | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Gráficos | emisiones sonoras máx. del ventilador |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrada | 25 vatios | 25 vatios | 12,318 puntos | 2,661 puntos | 29 dB(A) |
| Enthusiast | 45 vatios | 35 vatios | 15.494 puntos | 2.860 puntos | 37,6 dB(A) |
| Overboost | 60 vatios | 50 vatios | 16.315 puntos | 2.914 puntos | 44,6 dB(A) |
El XMG Evo 14 es un portátil superrápido y el AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Zen 4) ofreció un rendimiento muy bueno y estable en general, aunque no pudo seguir el ritmo del nuevo Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Zen 5). Aún así, las CPU Zen 5 sólo están disponibles actualmente con RAM soldada. Durante nuestra prueba, el Evo 14 fue siempre un dispositivo receptivo y no notamos ningún problema con la estabilidad del sistema; además, sus latencias también fueron muy bajas. Nuestro dispositivo de prueba utiliza la versión de 1 TB del Samsung 990 Pro, que logró tasas de transferencia muy altas. Éstas también se mantuvieron estables bajo una carga prolongada, lo que no es algo habitual.
El procesador integrado IGPU Radeon 780M alcanzó unos valores de rendimiento decentes y demostró ser especialmente impresionante en los juegos, situándose justo por detrás de la Intel Arc Graphics con 8 núcleos Xeque seguía claramente en cabeza durante las pruebas sintéticas. Sin embargo, la nueva Radeon 890M fue notablemente más rápida en nuestras pruebas comparativas estándar de juegos. Su rendimiento gráfico se mantuvo estable bajo carga prolongada.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=10) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 22544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=14) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=11) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=11) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33826 - 41668, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| PCMark 10 Score | 7284 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
* ... más pequeño es mejor
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 puntos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 puntos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 puntos | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 puntos | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 puntos | |
ayuda | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=51) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years) | |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| bajo | medio | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
Emisiones y potencia
La Evo 14 utiliza dos ventiladores y es un dispositivo muy silencioso durante el uso diario. Incluso al jugar o en la prueba de estrés, medimos un máximo de 37,6 dB(A) en modo Enthusiast. Sin embargo, cuando se utiliza el modo Equilibrado, el dispositivo se vuelve aún más silencioso (máx. 29 dB(A)) si ésta es su prioridad. En el modo Overboost, notamos un volumen de 44,6 dB(A), que apenas merece la pena ya que no se obtiene mucha más potencia. No hubo otros ruidos electrónicos procedentes de nuestro dispositivo de prueba.
Las temperaturas de su superficie eran completamente inofensivas, aparte de un punto caliente en la parte inferior. La zona del teclado, en particular, se mantuvo siempre a una temperatura agradable. Aún así, debe evitarse el contacto de la piel con la parte inferior durante un uso intensivo.
A pesar de su panel de alta resolución de 120 Hz, el consumo en reposo del portátil es muy bajo y tampoco notamos problemas bajo carga. Medimos un máximo de 83 vatios, y el valor se estabilizó rápidamente en ~76 vatios durante la prueba de estrés. La fuente de alimentación de 100 vatios es perfectamente adecuada. La batería de 80 Wh del dispositivo permite una buena autonomía, pero fue superada incluso por algunos competidores. En la prueba WLAN, medimos algo menos de 12 horas (150 cd/m²) y 9:40 horas (brillo máximo). A 120 Hz fueron unos 60 minutos menos en cada caso. En la prueba de vídeo, duró unas muy buenas 15,5 horas.
Ruido
| Ocioso |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB(A) |
| Carga |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distancia) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... más pequeño es mejor
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby | 0.46 / 1.39 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
71.7 / 83 Watt |
   
| |
Clave:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duración de Batería | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -8% | |
| H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 821 ? -12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 628 ? -12% |
| Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 97.8 ? -1% |
| Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1168 ? | ||||||
| Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - El XMG Evo 14 es un buen paquete total sin los compromisos habituales
El XMG Evo 14 de Schenker demuestra que incluso los portátiles modernos no tienen por qué prescindir de un montón de conexiones y amplias opciones de mantenimiento. Utilizando las dos ranuras de RAM, puede obtener hasta 96 GB, su capacidad SSD puede ampliarse con gran facilidad y hay un montón de conexiones a bordo. Además, el dispositivo puede configurarse ampliamente.
El procesador AMD ofrece un rendimiento bueno y, sobre todo, estable; lo mismo puede decirse de la Radeon 780M. La pantalla IPS del dispositivo cuenta con una alta resolución, una frecuencia de actualización de 120 Hz, así como colores precisos, lo que significa que puede editar imágenes sin esfuerzo dentro del espacio de color sRGB.
El nuevo Schenker XMG Evo 14 ofrece un buen paquete total que incluye una carcasa metálica por un precio de lanzamiento de poco más de 1.000 dólares. A pesar de su carcasa relativamente compacta, no tiene por qué prescindir de unos sólidos valores de rendimiento, numerosas conexiones y buenas opciones de mantenimiento.
Sus tiempos de ejecución son buenos en general, aunque bastantes competidores ofrecen un aguante aún mejor. Debería echar un vistazo al nuevo XMG Evo 14 en particular por su precio de lanzamiento de unos 1.000 dólares. Aunque el modelo Intel cuenta con soporte Thunderbolt 4, su limitado aumento de rendimiento no merece el sobreprecio a nuestros ojos.
Precio y disponibilidad
El XMG Evo 14 AMD no está disponible en Estados Unidos, pero puede adquirirse en tiendas internacionales como bestware.com, con precios a partir de unos 1.000 dólares.
Tenga en cuenta que: recientemente hemos actualizado nuestro sistema de clasificación y los resultados de la versión 8 no son comparables con los de la versión 7. Encontrará más información aquí.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
- 09/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
