Notebookcheck Logo

Breve análisis del EVGA SC17 GTX 1070

Más potencia, mismas características. El impresionante SC17 ya está oficialmente en el tren Pascal, pero su contínua falta de características pone al portátil en desventaja en la categoría de gaming 17".
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 (SC Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1442 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 369.37
Memoría
32 GB 
, 1300 MHz, 18-18-18-43, Dual-Channel
pantalla
17.30 pulgadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixels 255 PPI, Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, Nombre: LQ173D1JW31, ID: SHP145E, lustroso: no
Placa base
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco duro
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, Secundario: HGST HTS721010A9E630
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Conexiones
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Conexiones: 3.5 mm combo, Brightness Sensor
Equipamento de red
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 26.6 x 408 x 295.5
Battería
74.48 Wh, 4900 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Características adicionales
Altavoces: Realtek ALC 255, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, PrecisionX Mobile, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
4.131 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 775 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 287 mm 49 mm 4.1 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg418 mm 295 mm 39.9 mm 4.2 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg416 mm 279 mm 33 mm 3.3 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
506 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
647 MBit/s
346.5
cd/m²
387.2
cd/m²
354.2
cd/m²
366.2
cd/m²
399.1
cd/m²
342.9
cd/m²
353.8
cd/m²
363.3
cd/m²
324.1
cd/m²
Temperatura del cuarto
Sharp LQ173D1JW31 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 399.1 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 359.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.07 cd/m²
iluminación: 81 %
Brillo con batería: 399.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 998:1 (Negro: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.03
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440
MSI GT73VR 6RF
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Eurocom Sky X7E2
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-28%
-22%
-0%
-26%
Display P3 Coverage
87.3
60.9
-30%
63.6
-27%
86.6
-1%
66.6
-24%
sRGB Coverage
100
84.2
-16%
95.8
-4%
100
0%
84.1
-16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.8
61.2
-38%
65.7
-34%
99.2
0%
61.5
-38%
Response Times
52%
21%
40%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 ?(22.8, 22.8)
31 ?(11, 20)
32%
33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4)
26%
28 ?(10, 18)
39%
37 ?(13, 24)
19%
Response Time Black / White *
35.2 ?(9.2, 26)
10 ?(3, 7)
72%
30 ?(5.2, 24.8)
15%
21.2 ?(5.2, 16)
40%
24 ?(4, 20)
32%
PWM Frequency
1042 ?(29)
Screen
-33%
-12%
-9%
-3%
Brightness middle
399.1
343
-14%
334.8
-16%
332.6
-17%
362
-9%
Brightness
360
312
-13%
316
-12%
329
-9%
342
-5%
Brightness Distribution
81
80
-1%
87
7%
87
7%
87
7%
Black Level *
0.4
0.5
-25%
0.422
-6%
0.314
21%
0.31
22%
Contrast
998
686
-31%
793
-21%
1059
6%
1168
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.78
7.33
-53%
4.11
14%
5.94
-24%
4.5
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.65
10.79
-41%
7.8
-2%
8.6
-12%
9.31
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
7.6
-100%
5.74
-51%
6.27
-65%
3.48
8%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.19 100%
2.3 96%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
CCT
7288 89%
9024 72%
5987 109%
6704 97%
6144 106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.9
55
-37%
60.5
-30%
91
5%
55
-37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
84
-16%
96
-4%
100
0%
84
-16%
Media total (Programa/Opciones)
-3% / -21%
-4% / -10%
10% / -1%
-1% / -4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempos de respuesta del display

Los tiempos de respuesta del display muestran lo rápido que puede cambiar la pantalla de un color al siguiente. Tiempos lentos de respuesta pueden llevar a imágenes persistentes alrededor de objetos en movimiento o a displays borrosos. Particularmente los aficionados a los juegos 3D frenéticos deberían usar una pantalla con tiempos de respuesta rápidos.
       Tiempo de respuesta de Negro a Blanco
35.2 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 9.2 ms subida
↘ 26 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 240 (máximo) ms. » 92 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (20.9 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.
       Tiempo de respuesta 50% Gris a 80% Gris
45.6 ms ... subida ↗ y bajada ↘ combinada↗ 22.8 ms subida
↘ 22.8 ms bajada
La pantalla mostró tiempos de respuesta lentos en nuestros tests y podría ser demasiado lenta para los jugones.
En comparación, todos los dispositivos de prueba van de ##min### (mínimo) a 636 (máximo) ms. » 76 % de todos los dispositivos son mejores.
Eso quiere decir que el tiempo de respuesta es peor que la media (32.8 ms) de todos los dispositivos testados.

Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Para atenuar el brillo de pantalla algunos portátiles están encendiendo y apagando la retroiluminación muy rápidamente. Esto se hace a una frecuencia que no debiera detectarse a simple vista. Si la frecuencia es demasiado lenta, la gente sensible podría experimentar problemas visuales, dolores de cabeza e incluso ver parpadeos.
Parpadeo de Pantalla / PWM detectado 1042 Hz ≤ 29 % de brillo

La retroiluminación del display parpadea a 1042 Hz (seguramente usa PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) a un brillo del 29 % e inferior. Sobre este nivel de brillo no debería darse parpadeo / PWM.

La frecuencia de 1042 Hz es bastante alta, por lo que la mayoría de gente sensible al parpadeo no debería ver parpadeo o tener fatiga visual.

Comparación: 53 % de todos los dispositivos testados no usaron PWM para atenuar el display. Si se usó, medimos una media de 8705 (mínimo: 5 - máxmo: 343500) Hz.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
164 Points +8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points +5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points -5%
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
138 Points -9%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points +24%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
836 Points +18%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
675 Points -4%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points -20%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.88 Points +12%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points +2%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.24 Points +19%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points +10%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points -22%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
24966 Points +17%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
23815 Points +12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
6434 Points +14%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
6405 Points +14%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points -1%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
241.8 s * -8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.7 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.3 s * +8%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.9 s * +8%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
574 s * -0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572 s *
Asus R510JX-DM149H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
552 s * +3%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.6 s * +15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11567
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21313
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5632
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
73.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.68 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
124 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
706 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
ayuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points +9%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4252 Points -4%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3441 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points +17%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4378 Points -5%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4129 Points -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points +10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
8227 Points +6%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points -8%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4740 Points -39%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4437 puntos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7780 puntos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4623 puntos
ayuda
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 6RF
2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
4%
-30%
11%
-32%
Read Seq
1658
1499
-10%
914
-45%
1673
1%
1156
-30%
Write Seq
1249
1411
13%
916
-27%
1576
26%
294.9
-76%
Read 512
1044
966
-7%
698
-33%
1180
13%
616
-41%
Write 512
1254
1103
-12%
916
-27%
1561
24%
294.7
-76%
Read 4k
51.6
44.33
-14%
31.37
-39%
51.5
0%
42.7
-17%
Write 4k
145.2
155.5
7%
65.7
-55%
144
-1%
153.3
6%
Read 4k QD32
601
696
16%
425
-29%
694
15%
600
0%
Write 4k QD32
386.8
531
37%
441.8
14%
422.1
9%
295.3
-24%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1658 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1249 MB/s
512K Read: 1044 MB/s
512K Write: 1254 MB/s
4K Read: 51.6 MB/s
4K Write: 145.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 601 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 386.8 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
4841 Points +22%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
4126 Points +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
3957 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
2592 Points -34%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points -41%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
9994 Points +24%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
8057 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5541 Points -31%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points -42%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
20268 Points +18%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
19121 Points +12%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
17106 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
16685 Points -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points -24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
11957 Points -30%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points -43%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
29443 Points +31%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
23990 Points +7%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
22427 Points
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
21901 Points -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points -24%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points -43%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
12731 Points -43%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11623 Points +22%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
11482 Points +20%
MSI GT80-2QES32SR311BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4980HQ
10313 Points +8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
9550 Points
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points -3%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points -6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
8338 Points -13%
3DMark 11 Performance
16824 puntos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
136715 puntos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26217 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13287 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7357 puntos
ayuda
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
97.4 fps +1%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
96.4 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps -34%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps -37%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps -56%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
49.8 fps +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
40.6 fps
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
78.8 fps +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
63.9 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps -17%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
136.8 fps +4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
131.8 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps -19%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps -20%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps -47%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
117.9 fps +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
114 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps -23%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps -28%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps -56%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
106.6 fps +3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
103.2 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps -30%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps -34%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps -43%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps -54%
Batman: Arkham Knight
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
89 fps +2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
87 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps -29%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps -59%
3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
52 fps +16%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
45 fps
Fallout 4
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
111.3 fps +8%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
102.9 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps -23%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps -30%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps -58%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
51.7 fps +17%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
44.3 fps
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
128.9 fps +9%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
118.8 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps -19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps -29%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps -53%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
64.1 fps +27%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps
Overwatch - 3840x2160 High (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:4x
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
103.1 fps +23%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
83.5 fps
Mafia 3
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
73.6 fps +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62 fps
3840x2160 High Preset
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
22.1 fps
bajomedioaltoultra4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 63.9
BioShock Infinite (2013) 131.8
Metro: Last Light (2013) 114
Thief (2014) 103.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 87 45
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60 60
Fallout 4 (2015) 102.9 44.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 96.4 40.6
Doom (2016) 118.8 50.6
Overwatch (2016) 83.5
Mafia 3 (2016) 62 22.1

Ruido

Ocioso
33.9 / 33.9 / 33.9 dB(A)
Carga
43.8 / 53.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 29.2 dB(A)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Noise
-3%
-4%
1%
-1%
4%
off / environment *
29.2
30
-3%
29.2
-0%
28.9
1%
30
-3%
29.1
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33.9
33
3%
32
6%
28.9
15%
33
3%
33
3%
Idle Average *
33.9
35
-3%
32
6%
30.6
10%
34
-0%
33.2
2%
Idle Maximum *
33.9
40
-18%
35
-3%
35.7
-5%
35
-3%
33.7
1%
Load Average *
43.8
43
2%
50
-14%
49
-12%
45
-3%
41.7
5%
Load Maximum *
53.4
54
-1%
64
-20%
55
-3%
52
3%
48.2
10%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Carga Máx.
 44.2 °C47.6 °C44 °C 
 38.6 °C40.2 °C39.2 °C 
 35.8 °C35.8 °C36.6 °C 
Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C
49.8 °C53.2 °C47 °C
44.4 °C44.8 °C40.2 °C
38 °C37 °C37 °C
Máximo: 53.2 °C
Médio: 43.5 °C
Conector de corriente  51.2 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 20.5 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.7 °C / -13.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.835.22529.733.93130.133.24030.432.15029.830.36332.132.78030.331.810028.133.112526.83416026.840.720025.846.425024.849.131524.553.340025.258.550025.857.363024.857.580025.555.6100024.952.9125025.251.4160023.950.4200022.450.3250021.945.5315021.747400021.652.8500021.354.4630021.251.7800021.148.31000021.151.4125002147160002139.6SPL35.364.6N2.420.1median 24.5median 50.4Delta23.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEVGA SC17 GTX 1070Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.53 / 6.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 27.3 / 34.9 / 37.6 Watt
Carga midlight 164.4 / 202.5 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3"
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption
2%
-13%
25%
11%
Idle Minimum *
27.3
29
-6%
28.9
-6%
19
30%
20.9
23%
Idle Average *
34.9
31
11%
30.6
12%
25
28%
31.7
9%
Idle Maximum *
37.6
38
-1%
33.1
12%
31
18%
32.6
13%
Load Average *
164.4
111
32%
224.4
-36%
90
45%
142.8
13%
Load Maximum *
202.5
253
-25%
302.6
-49%
193
5%
210.5
-4%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
Ocioso (sin WLAN, min brillo)
4h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 40min
Carga (máximo brillo)
0h 55min
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74.48 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh
Eurocom Sky X7E2
6700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 89 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh
Duración de Batería
14%
23%
-9%
81%
32%
Reader / Idle
242
306
26%
137
-43%
432
79%
310
28%
WiFi v1.3
160
182
14%
198
24%
104
-35%
247
54%
206
29%
Load
55
65
18%
83
51%
115
109%
76
38%

Pro

+ relativamente delgado para un portátil con gráfica GTX 1070
+ diseño de chasis elegante y muy fuerte
+ 4K UHD mate con cobertura sRGB plena
+ CPU y GPU acelerables

Contra

- barebones; pocas opciones de hardware y características de conectividad
- ghosting moderado durante el juego; tiempos lentos de respuesta
- sólo 2x bahías de almacenamiento interno; no RAID
- ventiladores de sistema siempre activos
- touchpad con mala respuesta
- sin teclas auxiliares dedicadas
- poco aguante de batería
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de EVGA.
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070. Modelo de pruebas cortesía de EVGA.

El SC17 original con GTX 980M sobresalía por su enfoque en el overclocking a la vez que ofrecía una plataforma muy sólida mucho más portable que un barebone GT72, G752, o Clevo equivalentes. Ahora que la mayoría de fabricantes gaming han actualizado sus respectivos portátiles a Pascal, la última renovación SC17 no ofrece bastante para que merezcan la compra. Fabricantes como MSI y Aorus han aprovechado la oportunidad para añadir hasta más características más allá de una sencilla renovación de GPU, tales como pantallas 5 ms/120 Hz, G-Sync, RAID, teclas iluminadas RGB individualmente, teclas Macro y auxiliares,  Thunderbolt 3, y otros que le faltan al SC17. El EVGA ni siquiera tiene un sencillo lector de tarjetas como los salientes Razer Blade 14 o Blade Pro 17.

Rendimiento y especialmente calidad de construcción reflejan el precio premium, pero cuesta más olvidar la sensación barebone del SC17.

Ésta es una versión acortada del análisis original. Puedes leer el análisis completo en inglés aquí.

EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 - 11/20/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabado
94 / 98 → 96%
Teclado
85%
Ratón
67%
Conectividad
56 / 81 → 70%
Peso
48 / 10-66 → 68%
Battería
67%
Pantalla
90%
Rendimiento de juegos
97%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
93%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruido
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
55%
Cámara
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
73%
83%
Gaming - media ponderada

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Allen Ngo, 2016-11-23 (Update: 2020-06- 8)