Notebookcheck Logo

Analisis del portatil Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 - Un gamer delgado con una RTX 4090 y un potencial insatisfecho

Refrigeración de la cámara de vapor.

Asus sólo equipa los modelos más potentes del ROG Zephyrus G16 con refrigeración por cámara de vapor. Revisamos el modelo de gama alta con el Core Ultra 9 185H y el portátil GeForce RTX 4090. Sin embargo, ¿es la refrigeración realmente mejor que la vista en la RTX 4070 y qué compromisos se han tenido que hacer debido a la carcasa compacta?

El ROG Zephyrus G16 es actualmente la estrella fugaz en lo que a portátiles delgados para juegos de Asus se refiere. Hace unos meses, revisamos la variante con el Core Ultra 7 155H y la Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070. Ahora analizamos el modelo de gama alta con el Core Ultra 9 185H y la GeForce Portátil RTX 4090. Además de los componentes más potentes, nos encontramos con una refrigeración diferente. Aunque las configuraciones hasta el portátil RTX 4070 utilizan una unidad de refrigeración convencional formada por tres ventiladores y tubos de calor, los modelos de gama alta (portátil RTX 4080/4090) utilizan refrigeración por cámara de vapor. Por supuesto, queremos saber cómo afecta la nueva refrigeración tanto al rendimiento como a las emisiones.

Nuestro dispositivo de revisión posee el número GU605MY, cuesta 3.649 dólares y, además del Core Ultra 9 185H y el portátil GeForce RTX 4090, también viene con 32 GB de RAM y la ya familiar pantalla OLED de 240 Hz. En este análisis, prestaremos especial atención a las diferencias entre la configuración del portátil RTX 4070 y el rendimiento, así como a las emisiones de la variante de gama alta. Toda la información adicional sobre la carcasa, los dispositivos de entrada, la pantalla y los altavoces se puede encontrar en nuestro análisis del ROG Zephyrus G16 con el portátil RTX 4070.

Asus lanzará pronto una actualización con los nuevos procesadores AMD Strix Point (Zen5), sin embargo, estos modelos sólo estarán equipados con la GeForce Portátil RTX 4070.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY (ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 Serie)
Procesador
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, Meteor Lake-H
Adaptador gráfico
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Núcleo: 1455 MHz, Memoría: 2250 MHz, GDDR6, 555.99
Memoría
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
pantalla
16.00 pulgadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixels 189 PPI, ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, lustroso: si, 240 Hz
Placa base
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Disco duro
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, 2048 GB 
, M.2 PCIe
Tarjeta de sonido
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexiones
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Conexiones: 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD
Equipamento de red
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Tamaño
Alto x ancho x profundidad (en mm): 16.4 x 354 x 246
Battería
90 Wh Litio-Ion, 4-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionales
Altavoces: -cell, Teclado: Chiclet, Luz de Teclado: si, 24 Meses Garantía
Peso
1.908 kg, Suministro de Electricidad: 745 g
Precio
4300 Euros
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Posibles contendientes en la comparación

Valoración
Version
Fecha
Modelo
Peso
Altura
Tamaño
Resolución
Price
86.1 %v8
07/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %v8
06/2024
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
83.9 %v8
06/2024
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.7 mm16.00"3200x2000
88.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg18.57 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02/2024
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22 mm16.00"2560x1600

Nota: Recientemente hemos actualizado nuestro sistema de clasificación y los resultados de la versión 8 no son comparables con los de la versión 7. Encontrará más información aquí .

El modelo de gama alta del ROG Zephyrus G16 es visualmente indistinguible del modelo más débil equipado con el portátil RTX 4070/4060. Sin embargo, internamente las diferencias en el sistema de refrigeración se hacen evidentes. Mientras que los modelos más débiles utilizan un total de tres ventiladores y conductos de calor normales, Asus ha optado por la refrigeración por cámara de vapor con dos ventiladores para sus modelos más caros.

La refrigeración aumenta el peso de 1,817 kg a 1,908 kg, lo que sigue siendo ligero en comparación con los demás portátiles RTX 4090 del segmento de 16 pulgadas, ya que los dispositivos de comparación pesan al menos medio kilo más. Además, el Zephyrus es también simultáneamente uno de los modelos más delgados y compactos. Las configuraciones hasta el portátil RTX 4070 vienen con una fuente de alimentación de 200 vatios (583 gramos) y a partir del portátil RTX 4080 es una más potente de 240 vatios (745 gramos).

Portátil ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090
Portátil ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090
Portátil ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070
Portátil ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070

Comparación de tamaños

364.74 mm 289.81 mm 18.57 mm 2.7 kg356.7 mm 253 mm 26.6 mm 2.5 kg357.7 mm 277.7 mm 22.7 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 22 mm 2.5 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.9 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Rendimiento - Meteor Lake y RTX 4090 portátil

La variante de gama alta del Zephyrus está equipada actualmente con el procesador Meteor Lake más rápido, el Core Ultra 9 185H. En lo que respecta al rendimiento de la CPU, queda por detrás de las CPU HX de Intel. En la versión de 115 vatios encontrada aquí, la Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 portátil está bastante lejos de alcanzar el máximo rendimiento. La RAM instalada es de 32 GB (LPDDR5x 7467) pero, debido al precio y a la falta de posibilidad de actualización, habríamos preferido 64 GB.

 
 
 

Condiciones de la prueba

Los perfiles energéticos básicos siguen siendo idénticos y el modelo más potente con el portátil RTX 4090 también ofrece los perfiles Silencioso, Rendimiento y Turbo. En la tabla siguiente, hemos enumerado sus valores TDP/TGP correspondientes, así como el efecto sobre el rendimiento. Debajo, también hemos añadido los valores del modelo RTX 4070 del Zephyrus G16 para que pueda ver una comparación directa. En principio, los modelos con la refrigeración por cámara de vapor más potente pueden consumir un poco más de energía, pero la diferencia es bastante pequeña, sobre todo cuando se trata del procesador. Tanto en el perfil Silencioso como en el de Rendimiento, la refrigeración por cámara de vapor consigue incluso ser algo más ruidosa que la más débil Variante RTX 4070. Como es habitual, llevamos a cabo los puntos de referencia y las mediciones utilizando el modo turbo que, sin embargo, sólo está disponible cuando está conectado a la red eléctrica.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090 Laptop
Perfil energético Carga de la CPU CB R23 Multi Carga de la GPU Time Spy Gráficos Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra Volumen máx. del ventilador
Silencioso 60 vatios 15.750 puntos 55 vatios 9.731 puntos 40,2fps 41,4 dB(A)
Rendimiento 100->70 vatios 17.452 puntos 90 vatios 15.205 puntos 60,2fps 48,1 dB(A)
Turbo 110->80 vatios 19.109 puntos 115 vatios 19.109 puntos 68,1fps 52,3 dB(A)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
Perfil energético Carga de la CPU CB R23 Multi Carga de la GPU Time Spy Gráficos Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra Volumen máx. del ventilador
Silencioso 60->45 vatios 15.869 puntos 65 vatios 9.042 puntos 32,6fps 41,5 dB(A)
Rendimiento 70->50 vatios 17.133 puntos 80 vatios 10.989 puntos 43,7fps 46,4 dB(A)
Turbo 95->70 vatios 18.372 puntos 105 vatios 12.312 puntos 48,7fps 52,4 dB(A)

Procesador - Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

El Core Ultra 9 185H es el procesador móvil más rápido de la generación Meteor Lake de Intel, sin embargo, se encuentra claramente por detrás de los procesadores HX (actualización Raptor Lake). Como acabamos de observar en la tabla comparativa, tampoco hay diferencias tangibles entre el Core Ultra 9 y el Core Ultra 7 en ambos modelos del Zephyrus G16 2024, así como en el Alienware x16 R2. Este último también cuenta con el Core Ultra 9 185H.

Sin embargo, los otros competidores de la RTX 4090 con el Core i9 14900HX ofrecen un rendimiento de CPU significativamente superior, especialmente en las pruebas multinúcleo. El rendimiento multinúcleo del ROG Zephyrus G16 no siempre se mantiene del todo estable, aunque un déficit de alrededor del 10 % bajo carga sostenida puede considerarse bastante pequeño. En modo batería, el procesador puede consumir un máximo de 75 vatios, pero esto apenas tiene efecto en el rendimiento multi-core (~8 %). Puede encontrar más pruebas de rendimiento de la CPU aquí.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2756 (2704.71-3019.32)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
77.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
59.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
55.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54.2 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
52.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points +90%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31889 Points +67%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21953 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19110 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (12688 - 19851, n=18)
17685 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -10%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)
1893 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1876 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1166 - 1912, n=18)
1789 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1720 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points +89%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11960 Points +64%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8336 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7299 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4843 - 7651, n=18)
6824 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -8%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
718 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (442 - 735, n=18)
690 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
657 Points -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points +74%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4879 (4505.52min - 4878.64max) Points +62%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3433 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3019 (2704.71min - 3019.32max) Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1582 - 3165, n=20)
2719 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
275 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (191.9 - 281, n=18)
263 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
247 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (163 - 285, n=18)
191.9 Seconds * -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
169.7 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +36%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106 Seconds * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds * +46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS +86%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125676 MIPS +73%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85566 MIPS +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
72583 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51738 - 76331, n=18)
69105 MIPS -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS +31%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6318 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5651 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5452 MIPS -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4199 - 5781, n=18)
5418 MIPS -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -20%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19451 Points +34%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17559 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17499 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14540 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=112, last 2 years)
14207 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9140 - 14540, n=18)
13580 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12825 Points -12%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3129 Points +22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2964 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=112, last 2 years)
2651 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2559 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1490 - 2573, n=18)
2431 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2419 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2199 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points +63%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21642 Points +53%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15073 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14137 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9330 - 14230, n=18)
13130 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1897 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1846 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (986 - 1902, n=18)
1782 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1729 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps +66%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.7 fps +44%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21.3 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (14.1 - 22.7, n=18)
19.9 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.6 s * -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
47.5 s * -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
45.9 s * -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (34.5 - 62, n=18)
44.6 s * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32.9 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4859 sec * -13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (0.4313 - 0.759, n=19)
0.4712 sec * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4368 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4313 sec *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec * +15%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3019 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
192.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
275 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7299 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
718 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1876 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19110 Points
ayuda
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.9 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
64.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
58.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
30829 KRay/s +77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
27535 KRay/s +58%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25682 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21914 KRay/s +26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
18676 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17461 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9220 - 18676, n=18)
16273 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150728 Points +66%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136486 Points +50%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127908 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106726 Points +17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96463 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90983 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (48865 - 96463, n=18)
84562 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7588 MB/s +77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7000 MB/s +64%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6188 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4910 MB/s +15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4534 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (2394 - 4534, n=18)
3964 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148966 Points +63%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138473 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130803 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
117145 Points +28%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94794 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91400 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (66785 - 95241, n=18)
89440 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18114 Points +63%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16268 Points +47%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15857 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13258 Points +20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
11095 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11092 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (7255 - 11392, n=18)
10503 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76668 Points +70%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68467 Points +52%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64134 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53700 Points +19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48020 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
45127 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (24004 - 48020, n=18)
41496 Points -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145389 MB/s +72%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133395 MB/s +57%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122937 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109216 MB/s +29%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (53116 - 154066, n=18)
91410 MB/s +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88763 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84774 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2239 MB/s +86%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2043 MB/s +70%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1863 MB/s +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1367 MB/s +14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1298 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1201 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (678 - 1341, n=18)
1156 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16655 KRay/s +79%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14791 KRay/s +59%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13993 KRay/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11803 KRay/s +27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10078 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
9329 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4428 - 10078, n=18)
8523 KRay/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -9%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54702 MPixel/s +5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53242 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
52181 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49616 MPixel/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49305 MPixel/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (44809 - 53918, n=18)
49034 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40243 MPixel/s -23%

Rendimiento del sistema

Algo menos sorprendente es que la variante de gama alta del Zephyrus G16 es un portátil muy sensible. Aunque los resultados de los benchmarks también son buenos, una vez más, la competencia equipada con el procesador HX rinde mejor. Sin embargo, esto no se nota en situaciones cotidianas. Debido a la conmutación de gráficos Advanced Optimus, hay una breve congelación ocasional al arrancar juegos cuando el sistema cambia a la dGPU, sin embargo, eso es completamente normal.

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7993 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
7993 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7803 Points -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10835 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
10835 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10833 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -7%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
9937 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
9937 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9904 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -7%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points +3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
12872 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
12872 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12134 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)
1910 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1815 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1815 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points -12%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points +27%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)
1809 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1700 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1700 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)
2097 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2070 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
2070 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points -24%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points +37%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)
1709 Points +15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1490 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1490 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points -4%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
281 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
281 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -1%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -16%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
269 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
269 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years)
267 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
522 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
522 ms * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
502 ms * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms * +18%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

PCMark 10 Score
7993 puntos
ayuda
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93766 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (69929 - 95718, n=18)
84684 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65434 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86010 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (64619 - 87768, n=18)
80059 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69366 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75937 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51114 - 93871, n=18)
72390 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67198 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (121.4 - 259, n=18)
145.8 ns * -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.9 ns *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * +32%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns * +45%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Latencias del CPD

En nuestra prueba de latencia estandarizada (navegación por Internet, reproducción 4K de YouTube, carga de la CPU), con la BIOS actual, el dispositivo de análisis mostró limitaciones a la hora de utilizar aplicaciones de audio en tiempo real. Sin embargo, ese ya era el caso con el Modelo RTX 4070.

LatencyMon - Visión general
LatencyMon - Visión general
LatencyMon - Controladores
LatencyMon - Controladores
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
16146 μs * -536%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2536.9 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs * +2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2448.1 μs * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * +45%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Almacenamiento masivo

El modelo RTX 4090 también ofrece dos ranuras M.2 2280.
El modelo RTX 4090 también ofrece dos ranuras M.2 2280.

El Zephyrus G16 ofrece dos rápidas ranuras PCIe 4.0 para unidades SSD M.2 2280, lo que significa que la capacidad de almacenamiento puede ampliarse de forma rápida y asequible. Nuestro dispositivo de revisión viene con una de 2 TB, Samsung PM9A1a aunque 1,76 TB están disponibles para el usuario después de la primera instalación. En las pruebas sintéticas, la unidad SSD no cumplió del todo nuestras expectativas, pero seguimos estando ante una unidad de almacenamiento muy rápida, con velocidades de transferencia que se mantienen perfectamente constantes incluso bajo carga sostenida. Puede encontrar más pruebas comparativas de la SSD aquí.

Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7104 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5141 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 397 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 415 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 364 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1030 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.7 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
76 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
 
75.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
70.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
65.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4224 (3741.6min - 4224.02max) MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3541 - 3908, n=2)
3725 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3541 (3501.11min - 3540.88max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3347 (3203.49min - 3347.47max) MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4899 (4625.25min - 4898.53max) MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3812 MB/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3750 (3377.21min - 3749.92max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3160 - 4335, n=2)
3748 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3160 (3033.95min - 3160.41max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -20%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7106 (6065.83min - 7105.62max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (7084 - 7106, n=2)
7095 MB/s 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6823 (5715.47min - 6822.87max) MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6523 (5649.96min - 6522.56max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6323 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s +31%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5248 - 5255, n=2)
5252 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5248 (5141.58min - 5248.1max) MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5208 (5161.3min - 5208.07max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5092 (4641.78min - 5091.77max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (64.25min - 79.25max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (69.9 - 80.7, n=2)
75.3 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
69.9 (69.26min - 69.89max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
59.1 (58.3min - 59.06max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
244 (238.59min - 244.13max) MB/s +87%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +72%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
209 (203.44min - 208.84max) MB/s +60%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s +57%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (130.3 - 230, n=2)
180.2 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
130.3 (127.94min - 130.31max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s +724%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4245 (4210.56min - 4245.12max) MB/s +611%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s +524%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2997 (2834.64min - 2996.72max) MB/s +402%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2571 MB/s +331%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (597 - 3732, n=2)
2165 MB/s +263%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
597 (590.16min - 596.69max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s +1051%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s +803%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2907 (2737.8min - 2907.05max) MB/s +640%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2673 (2401.6min - 2673.33max) MB/s +580%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2137 MB/s +444%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (393 - 2900, n=2)
1647 MB/s +319%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
393 (388.68min - 393.4max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points +67%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8139 Points +45%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points +26%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5595 - 8367, n=2)
6981 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6847 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5595 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -42%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points +149%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3204 Points +129%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points +103%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2722 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points +74%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (1402 - 3272, n=2)
2337 Points +67%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1402 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -27%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3588 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3490 - 3588, n=2)
3539 Points -1%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3341 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2686 Points -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -50%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s +6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5642.41 MB/s +5%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5351 - 5637, n=2)
5494 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5351 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2272 MB/s -58%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s +107%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4787.7 MB/s +76%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s +39%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (2713 - 4295, n=2)
3504 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3289 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2713 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -29%
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (72.9 - 75.6, n=2)
74.2 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
72.9 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.48 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
55.9 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -42%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s +38%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
213.62 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s +18%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (180.5 - 207, n=2)
193.9 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
188.6 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
180.5 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -13%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s +269%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2569.34 MB/s +224%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2439 MB/s +207%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s +196%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s +137%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (794 - 2637, n=2)
1715 MB/s +116%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
794 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3136 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (2867 - 3136, n=2)
3001 MB/s -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2648.4 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2168 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -54%
Access Time Read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.09 ms * -275%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * -132%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (0.024 - 0.046, n=2)
0.035 ms * -46%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.034 ms * -42%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.024 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.055 ms * -139%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -106%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.023 ms *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.023 ms * -0%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (0.022 - 0.023, n=2)
0.0225 ms * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms * +30%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7094 (6297.96-7117.29)

Tarjeta gráfica - GeForce RTX 4090 portátil

GPU-Z GeForce RTX 4090 portátil
GPU-Z GeForce RTX 4090 portátil

El Zephyrus G16 está disponible con toda la gama de modelos actuales de portátiles GeForce RTX (4050-4090), sin embargo, el diseño delgado se hace notar en las variantes rápidas. En el modo turbo, el GeForce Portátil RTX 4090 sólo funciona con un TGP de 95 vatios + 20 vatios de refuerzo dinámico, lo que significa que está bastante lejos de la configuración máxima de 175 vatios (150 TGP + 25 vatios de refuerzo dinámico). Esto es algo que los compradores potenciales deberían saber para evitar decepciones posteriores. En los puntos de referencia de la GPU, podemos ver claramente la desventaja en comparación con otros modelos de portátiles RTX 4090 que son entre un 15 y un 26 % más rápidos. Incluso el Portátil RTX 4080 que se encuentra en el Alienware x16 R2 (175W) es un toque más rápido que la RTX 4090 alojada en el Zephyrus G16.

La ventaja en comparación con el Zephyrus G16 con el portátil RTX 4070 se sitúa en el 50 %, lo que sigue siendo, por supuesto, enorme, sobre todo teniendo en cuenta la carcasa compacta. Básicamente, el portátil RTX 4070 (y también las versiones más débiles) pueden alcanzar mejor su potencial cuando se emparejan con el Zephyrus G16. Dependiendo del caso de uso, una mayor cantidad de memoria de vídeo (16 GB) puede ser una ventaja adicional, por ejemplo, al editar vídeos.

Bajo carga sostenida, el rendimiento de la GPU se mantiene estable, sin embargo, en modo batería, la GPU puede consumir un máximo de 55 vatios y por eso el rendimiento de la GPU cae significativamente aquí (-52 %). Puede encontrar más pruebas de rendimiento de la GPU aquí.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
93.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.4 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
82 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
79.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
60.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
52.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
65956 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=42)
65041 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64341 Points +19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
54073 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37313 Points -31%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46527 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=41)
46365 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43518 Points +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
40259 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26568 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=43)
20950 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20416 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19878 Points +17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
16950 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10989 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190820 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190540 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (159127 - 209521, n=20)
187721 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167047 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
161798 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
153327 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=111, last 2 years)
116410 Points -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
107953 Points -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
38012 puntos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
30964 puntos
3DMark Time Spy Score
15660 puntos
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
3915 puntos
ayuda
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -61%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
15 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +8%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * -70%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +15%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds *
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)
294 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
202 Seconds * +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 305, n=39)
199.1 Seconds * +35%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
193 Seconds * +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167 Seconds * +45%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Rendimiento en juegos

La imagen pintada en las pruebas de GPU también continúa en los puntos de referencia de juegos, ya que el portátil RTX 4090 que se encuentra en el Zephyrus G16 combinado con el Core Ultra 185H queda notablemente por detrás de la competencia equipada tanto con las CPU HX como con el portátil RTX 4090. El Alienware x16 R2 emparejado con el Core Ultra 9 y el portátil RTX 4080 también ofrece un rendimiento de juego ligeramente mejor. Una vez más, el Zephyrus G16 con el portátil RTX 4070 resulta rotundamente superado, especialmente en las pruebas QHD.

En definitiva, el Zephyrus G16 con el portátil RTX 4090 y el rápido panel OLED se adaptan maravillosamente a los juegos. En su resolución QHD nativa, puede, sin dudarlo, jugar a todos los títulos actuales con fluidez y al máximo detalle. Sin embargo, nuestro bucle Cyberpunk 2077 muestra que el rendimiento de juego cuando se ejecutan títulos exigentes no es del todo estable y que hay pequeñas caídas de rendimiento. Puede encontrar más pruebas comparativas de juegos aquí.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.8 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
69.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53.5 pt
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps +49%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.1 (4.19min, 83.3P1) fps +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.2 (0.938min, 111.1P1) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)
113.7 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
107.1 (3.03min, 66.7P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +41%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (70.6min) fps +36%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps -26%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
196.9 fps +43%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
165.1 fps +20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139.8 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)
119.9 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100.8 fps -27%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps +40%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
369 (5min, 269P1) fps +28%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
359.8 (30.2min, 253P1) fps +25%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
288 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
229 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -55%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps +40%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
188.1 (155.2min) fps +36%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164.5 (136min) fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.7 (119.5min) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (114.5min) fps -5%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.2 fps +62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps +61%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)
108.4 fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.2 fps -10%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +41%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (70.6min) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.1 - 144.7, n=19)
120.8 fps +30%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 (53.7min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 103.9, n=19)
89.9 fps +32%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 (70.4min) fps +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.39 (67.14min) fps +22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75.4 (25.4min) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.1 (55.3min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=70, last 2 years)
65 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.7 fps -36%
F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
149.2 (10min, 97P1) fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (86.2 - 149.2, n=9)
120.4 fps +40%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.2 (94min, 78P1) fps +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.2 (59min, 67P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 149.2, n=40, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55.8 (45min, 43P1) fps -35%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.6 (2min, 80P1) fps +149%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 144.6, n=9)
83.7 fps +44%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72.4 (58min, 56P1) fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58 (36min, 46P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 144.6, n=31, last 2 years)
50.5 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36 (22min, 28P1) fps -38%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (78min, 90P1) fps +44%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.6 (14min, 69P1) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88 - 127, n=4)
112.2 fps +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 (55min, 58P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -11%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58.5 - 84.7, n=4)
73.6 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72.1 (2min, 56P1) fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min, 47P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=12, last 2 years)
55.8 fps -5%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (118 - 208, n=7)
177.5 fps +50%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
159.4 fps +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -12%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (99 - 155.2, n=7)
133.2 fps +35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
124.3 fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=34, last 2 years)
82.2 fps -17%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.2 (73.2min, 82.8P0.1, 91.6P1) fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 125.2, n=3)
100 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 125.2, n=10, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -18%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98 (65.7min, 67.6P0.1, 76.8P1) fps +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 98, n=3)
79.7 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
66 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 98, n=9, last 2 years)
57.1 fps -13%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (148 - 205, n=7)
175.1 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 205, n=18, last 2 years)
112.5 fps -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps -36%
2560x1440 Extreme Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 162, n=7)
138.6 fps +23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (48 - 162, n=15, last 2 years)
95.9 fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64 fps -43%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø70.9 (62.3-84.9)
bajomedioaltoultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 172.6 107.1 103.4 139.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 172.2 150.8 150.3 138.7 135.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 183.5 168.4 138 113.3 68.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 138.3 111.7 90 75.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 138 128 117 115 80
Strange Brigade (2018) 431 340 314 288 225 120
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 173 166 154 148 114 59
F1 23 (2023) 215 217 211 86.2 58 50.1 30.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 144 126 123 118 99 57
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 119.8 106.6 109.6 93.1 68.1 32.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 204 189 155 148 113 73
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 117 110 89 81 66 42.5
F1 24 (2024) 230 232 216 88 58.5 49.8 30.3
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) 67 40 44 39

Emisiones - La cámara de vapor suele ser más ruidosa

Emisiones sonoras

El volumen del ventilador depende en gran medida del perfil de energía seleccionado. En reposo y con poca carga, la Zephyrus G16 se mantiene muy silenciosa, incluso en los perfiles más rápidos. Cuando se juega y se utilizan tanto el perfil Silencioso como el de Rendimiento, la refrigeración de la cámara de vapor se vuelve un poco más ruidosa que en el modelo RTX 4070 y, sin auriculares, sólo es realmente posible jugar correctamente utilizando el perfil Silencioso . En el modo turbo, éste alcanza los 52,3 dB(A), lo que representa el volumen máximo del ventilador de la variante RTX 4070. Sin embargo, la competencia llega a ser incluso ligeramente más ruidosa, con la única excepción de la Blade 16 - aunque, realmente no se puede llamar a 50 dB(A) silencioso. Nuestro dispositivo de revisión no emitía ningún otro ruido electrónico. Según Asus, el problema que encontramos con el tercer ventilador en nuestra revisión de la variante RTX 4070 debería haberse solucionado ya mediante una actualización de la BIOS.

ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
Perfil energético 3DMark 06 Cyberpunk 2077 prueba de estrés
Silencioso 30,9 dB(A) 41,4 dB(A) 41,4 dB(A)
Rendimiento 36,1 dB(A) 48,1 dB(A) 48,1 dB(A)
Turbo 49,2 dB(A) 52,3 dB(A) 52,3 dB(A)
ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
Perfil energético 3DMark 06 Cyberpunk 2077 prueba de estrés
Silencioso 30,4 dB(A) 41,5 dB(A) 41,5 dB(A)
Rendimiento 34,2 dB(A) 46,4 dB(A) 46,4 dB(A)
Turbo 41,5 dB(A) 52,4 dB(A) 52,4 dB(A)

Ruido

Ocioso
24.6 / 27.8 / 31.9 dB(A)
Carga
49.2 / 52.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distancia)   environment noise: 24.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.441.143.540.840.240.62538.538.432.435.430.637.3313434.627.129.128.332.74031.532.528.231.130.6315026.730.62425.724.8296327.62824.225.527.528.68027.228.621.421.824.9271002627.421.323.322.226.612528.22720.521.421.428.116026.929.219.420.920.128.12003331.321.421.719.131.725029.831.821.621.121.732.831530.333.118.719.515.632.140031.833.818.320.314.13350032.335.517.421.21234.663030.934.216.218.61233.480034.437.416.420.311.336.4100037.141.516.921.71139125038.342.417.723.610.940.9160039.342.116.424.2114220004043.915.520.711.142.7250038.643.914.819.811.441.8315035.540.213.616.211.939.4400032.338.113.414.512.236.2500031.837.1141412.535.5630031.738.513.913.712.536.5800026.535.213.413.412.732.61000021.729.913.213.212.927.11250019.427.313.213.512.624.6160001521.812.512.511.718.8SPL4852.327.831.924.651N5.8811.40.67.3median 31.8median 35.2median 16.4median 20.3median 12.5median 33.4Delta4.55.22.62.82.65hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise
-5%
12%
9%
10%
9%
off / environment *
24.6
26
-6%
23
7%
23.4
5%
23
7%
23.9
3%
Idle Minimum *
24.6
28
-14%
23
7%
23.8
3%
23
7%
23.9
3%
Idle Average *
27.8
29
-4%
23
17%
28.5
-3%
23
17%
27.8
-0%
Idle Maximum *
31.9
31
3%
23
28%
28.5
11%
27.66
13%
30.1
6%
Load Average *
49.2
51
-4%
39
21%
28.8
41%
43.76
11%
34.2
30%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
52.3
Load Maximum *
52.3
56
-7%
55.56
-6%
54.2
-4%
50.37
4%
46.4
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
55.32
49.5
46.81
46.4

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Temperatura

En uso idele y ejecutando tareas sencillas, las superficies metálicas de la carcasa permanecen muy frías y puede colocar el dispositivo sobre su regazo sin ninguna duda. Al jugar y en la prueba de estrés, medimos temperaturas de la unidad base de hasta 47 °C en el centro de la zona trasera. Esto no es motivo de preocupación, pero no debería utilizar el dispositivo sobre su regazo en tales escenarios. En la parte superior de la unidad base, la zona central por encima del teclado es propensa a calentarse, pero el teclado en sí se mantiene significativamente más fresco, con temperaturas máximas de 40 °C en el centro y de unos 36 °C a ambos lados. Esto significa que teclear va sin problemas y que jugar es también una experiencia sin restricciones.

 43.1 °C45.9 °C44.5 °C 
 34.9 °C39.9 °C36.9 °C 
 30.8 °C29.2 °C30.5 °C 
Máximo: 45.9 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
47.5 °C46.1 °C47.2 °C
32.8 °C44.5 °C39.5 °C
30.4 °C32.1 °C31.2 °C
Máximo: 47.5 °C
Médio: 39 °C
Conector de corriente  45.9 °C | Temperatura del cuarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
Temperaturas de la superficie de la prueba de tensión (arriba)
Temperaturas de la superficie de la prueba de tensión (arriba)
Temperaturas de la superficie de la prueba de tensión (abajo)
Temperaturas de la superficie de la prueba de tensión (abajo)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-6%
-32%
-23%
-4%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.9
47
-2%
56
-22%
51
-11%
45
2%
50.3
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
47.5
56
-18%
53
-12%
50.8
-7%
45
5%
48
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
26.1
27
-3%
38
-46%
36.6
-40%
29
-11%
28.8
-10%
Idle Bottom *
26.6
27
-2%
39
-47%
35.2
-32%
30
-13%
29.8
-12%

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Prueba de esfuerzo

En la prueba de estrés con carga combinada de CPU/GPU, el modelo superior de Zephyrus fue incapaz de rendir de forma constante. El consumo de energía de la CPU fluctuó periódicamente entre 40-80 vatios y, al cabo de una hora, se situó en una media de 53 vatios. La tarjeta gráfica no está sujeta a fluctuaciones tan grandes, pero aún así "sólo" funciona a unos 58 vatios. Según Asus, en este escenario, estos valores deberían ser de 35 vatios para el procesador y 95 vatios para la tarjeta gráfica, sin embargo, no pudimos reproducir estos valores.

Datos de la prueba de estrés de la CPU/GPU
Datos de la prueba de estrés de la CPU/GPU

Altavoces

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.246.32530.637.43128.3364030.637.25024.839.26327.543.98024.951.810022.263.112521.468.116020.165.820019.17125021.772.731515.673.140014.173.95001272.86301274.980011.37610001172.4125010.97316001169.7200011.168250011.469315011.968400012.270.6500012.568.5630012.564.8800012.769.51000012.966.61250012.663.31600011.761.6SPL24.683N0.663.4median 12.5median 69.5Delta2.6338.136.532.836.844.146.527.830.520.533.626.43217.438.721.549.818.447.619.255.422.260.819.163.217.561.71664.515.570.913.475.21275.113.275.612.875.91475.613.373.212.873.113.174.713.273.21377.813.574.913.972.714.465.31360.612.555.525.986.40.871.1median 13.5median 72.727.132.124.832.128.423.428.429.728.229.725.716.525.729.222.129.232.123.832.135.412.335.441.319.741.344.314.944.350.61150.654.616.554.655.414.755.46412.46466.110.966.165.89.265.8667.86670.78.770.768.88.668.867.8967.867.59.867.571.210.171.266.31166.366.811.266.861.111.761.161.511.861.563.21263.264.212.164.264.812.164.864.812.564.865.711.165.779237945.80.445.8median 64.8median 11.2median 64.84.81.94.837.831.737.838.824.638.841.621.341.641.718.741.744.720.444.745.119.245.152.820.152.859.717.359.764.414.164.472.614.472.676.213.876.281.514.581.582.414.182.480.813.680.879.911.779.981.411.481.476.71276.773.51173.577.310.577.37811.17880.511.880.58011.88079.511.379.573.711.473.774.311.774.373.912.173.971137173.212.873.269.311.969.369.611.469.689.923.989.993.70.593.7median 76.7median 11.9median 76.73.81.33.83032.83030.931.430.935.742.935.723.728.123.726.219.726.231.216.431.245.113.845.145.919.845.951.414.551.45913.95964.117.864.168.614.368.667.19.667.167.68.567.672.97.572.977.47.477.4717.77164.88.164.865.88.265.867.58.867.568.89.868.868.710.568.77010.67066.410.966.467.311.267.36411.56464.711.664.767126763.211.863.25510.75581.222.581.254.70.454.7median 67median 10.7median 673.62.53.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Alienware x16 R2 P120FRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Diagrama de frecuencia en comparación (¡las casillas de verificación se pueden marcar y desmarcar!)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gestión de la energía - Más resistencia que la competencia

Consumo de energía

Funcionando en reposo, los valores de consumo representan la variante más débil del ROG Zephyrus G16 y esto tampoco es sorprendente teniendo en cuenta que los paneles OLED son idénticos. Al jugar, con unos 170 vatios, la Zephyrus G16 es considerablemente más eficiente que la competencia RTX 4090 que consume al menos 230 vatios al jugar. En la prueba de estrés, observamos brevemente un consumo máximo de 232 vatios que luego se estabilizó rápidamente en torno a los 160 vatios. Esto significa que la fuente de alimentación de 240 vatios suministrada tiene el tamaño adecuado.

Consumo de corriente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.43 / 1.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.8 / 10.9 / 11.6 Watt
Carga midlight 98.7 / 232 Watt
 color bar
Clave: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-51%
-108%
-57%
-64%
5%
-97%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
7.8
6
23%
20.5
-163%
9.9
-27%
16.9
-117%
8.3
-6%
16.2 ?(6 - 32.3, n=29)
-108%
Idle Average *
10.9
16
-47%
27.7
-154%
14.5
-33%
17.8
-63%
12.5
-15%
23.1 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29)
-112%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
28
-141%
32.1
-177%
33.5
-189%
19.6
-69%
12.8
-10%
34.2 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29)
-195%
Load Average *
98.7
130
-32%
105
-6%
97.5
1%
128
-30%
71.3
28%
130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29)
-32%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
157.3
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
165.5
Load Maximum *
232
361
-56%
323
-39%
315.2
-36%
328
-41%
169.1
27%
324 ?(221 - 418, n=29)
-40%
Witcher 3 ultra *
302
246
230
243
127.5

* ... más pequeño es mejor

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø162.6 (146.8-232)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.99 (4.38-19)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø157.3 (139.6-164.6)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (124.9-148.9)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø146.2 (145.5-147.1)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø51 (42.9-59.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø142.4 (133.8-147.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø148.5 (143.7-157)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21.4 (20.1-23.4)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø165.5 (143.1-192.6)

Duración de las pilas

La batería de 90 vatios-hora es idéntica en todas las versiones del Zephyrus G16 2024 pero, en la prueba Wi-Fi, la autonomía de la batería es unos 30 minutos menor que en el caso de la variante RTX 4070. La competencia directa en juegos con el portátil RTX 4090 sigue siendo superada. En la prueba Wi-Fi a 150 cd/m² y 60 Hz, se obtienen 6,5 horas (5,5 horas a 120 Hz) y 5 horas (60 Hz) a pleno brillo (4,5 horas a 120 Hz). Con el dispositivo encendido, un ciclo de carga completo dura 104 minutos; el 80 % de la capacidad está disponible tras 47 minutos.

Tiempo de Ejecución de la Batería
WiFi Websurfing
6h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 03min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
435 min +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
391 min
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years)
375 min -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
350 min -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
329 min -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
290 min -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
193 min -51%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
345 min +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
303 min
Average of class Gaming
  (156 - 578, n=46, last 2 years)
300 min -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
265 min -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
197 min -35%

Pro

+ Carcasa muy premium y compacta
+ Brillante pantalla OLED de 240 Hz, G-Sync
+ Muy buen rendimiento en juegos
+ Excelentes altavoces
+ Maravillosos dispositivos de entrada
+ 2 ranuras SSD
+ Buen rendimiento del sistema

Contra

- El portátil RTX 4090 no alcanza su potencial
- RAM soldada, máximo 32 GB
- Brillo HDR máximo limitado
- Sin Wi-Fi 7

Veredicto - El portátil RTX 4090 no cumple su potencial

Revisión: Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024. Dispositivo de revisión proporcionado por Asus Alemania.
Revisión: Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024. Dispositivo de revisión proporcionado por Asus Alemania.

El Asus Zephyrus G16 2024 es un portátil para juegos delgado y comparativamente ligero que también es adecuado para otros grupos objetivo como los creadores de contenidos y los usuarios multimedia. Haber optado por el portátil RTX 4090 significa, por supuesto, que el rendimiento gráfico es el foco principal, pero, aquí es también exactamente donde radica un problema. En principio, es bueno que Asus ofrezca los modelos de GPU más rápidos, pero la delgada carcasa exige compromisos a pesar de la refrigeración por cámara de vapor mejorada. Con un consumo máximo de 115 vatios en el modo Turbo , el portátil RTX 4090 es simplemente incapaz de explotar su potencial, quedándose generalmente un 20-25 % por detrás de la competencia (incluso el portátil RTX 4080 que se encuentra en el Alienware x16 es ligeramente más rápido). A pesar de ello, el portátil RTX 4090 le costará el precio completo. Eso es simplemente un compromiso que tiene que aceptar por la carcasa más compacta, pero es algo que los compradores potenciales deben tener en cuenta.

La cámara de vapor aumenta el peso en comparación con la refrigeración convencional (modelos hasta el portátil RTX 4070) en unos 100 gramos y es algo más ruidosa tanto en el perfil de energía Silencioso como en el de Rendimiento. Ambas configuraciones sólo son indistinguibles entre sí en el modo Turbo. Efectivamente, esto significa que debe llevar auriculares cuando juegue.

Con el ROG Zephyrus G16, Asus ofrece un portátil muy compacto de 16 pulgadas con la GeForce RTX 4090. Sin embargo, una buena movilidad exige compromisos en términos de rendimiento y otros modelos RTX 4090 tienen ventajas cuando se trata de rendimiento en juegos.

Las demás ventajas y desventajas del Zephyrus G16 también se aplican a la configuración de gama alta, incluidos los maravillosos altavoces y el brillante panel OLED de 240 Hz. Pero, una gran desventaja es la RAM soldada y ni siquiera se obtienen 64 GB de RAM en la variante de gama alta de 3.649 dólares.

Cualquiera a la caza del máximo rendimiento gráfico en un portátil potencialmente compacto de 16 pulgadas estará bien servido por el ROG Zephyrus G16. Sin embargo, no debe esperar el mismo rendimiento que encontraría en los competidores más pesados/grandes. Si se trata de rendimiento puro para juegos, modelos como el XMG Neo 16 o el Alienware x16 R2 simplemente ofrecen más potencia.

Precio y disponibilidad

El ROG Zephyrus G16 con el Intel Core Ultra 9 185H y un portátil Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 tiene un PVPR de 3.649 dólares y el dispositivo puede adquirirse actualmente en Amazon.

Nota: Recientemente hemos actualizado nuestro sistema de clasificación y los resultados de la versión 8 no son comparables con los de la versión 7. Encontrará más información aquí .

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY - 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Acabado
90 / 98 → 92%
Teclado
92%
Ratón
100%
Conectividad
63 / 80 → 79%
Peso
64 / 10-68 → 93%
Battería
69 / 95 → 73%
Pantalla
87%
Rendimiento de juegos
86%
Rendimiento de la Aplicación
86%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 91%
Ruido
67 / 90 → 75%
Audio
91%
Cámara
38 / 75 → 51%
Médio
65%
86%
Gaming - media ponderada
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
73.2%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análisis y pruebas de ordenadores portátiles y móviles teléfonos > Análisis > Analisis del portatil Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 - Un gamer delgado con una RTX 4090 y un potencial insatisfecho
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-16 (Update: 2024-07-16)